Good And Bad News About The ACA Penalty Tax

By :: June 12th, 2014

An important feature of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the penalty tax imposed on people who do not have health insurance. But newly updated report from the Congressional Budget Office projects that just under 4 million people will pay the penalty in 2016, less than 15 percent of the estimated 30 million people who won’t have coverage that year. That’s both good and bad news.

The good news is most people potentially subject to the penalty tax will obtain coverage. Of the 30 million people who CBO says won’t have insurance, 23 million—more than 75 percent—will be exempt from the tax. They include people with religious objections to health insurance, American Indians, people who are in jail, or are “not lawfully present” in the U.S., among others. There’s also no penalty if coverage would cost more than 8 percent of income. And in the many states that have refused to expand Medicaid coverage as the ACA allows, people who would have been covered under that program will also be exempt from the penalty.

That leaves 7 million uninsured who will be subject to the tax in 2016, less than 3 percent of the nonelderly population. In other words, CBO says the combination of the individual mandate, premium subsidies, and the penalty tax will induce most people to obtain coverage.

So what’s the bad news? Of the 7 million people who will owe tax, CBO says more than 40 percent won’t pay. Some will get exemptions for hardship or other reasons—that’s a good thing. But others will, in CBO’s understated words, “try to avoid payments.” Under the ACA legislation, the IRS has limited ability to collect the penalty. It cannot, for example, garnish wages as it could to recover other tax underpayments.

CBO’s bottom line on penalties: 3.9 million people will pay a total of $4.2 billion for 2016, an average of about $1,075 per person. Roughly 60 percent will come from people with income too high to get ACA premium subsidies—more than 400 percent of federal poverty guidelines. According to CBO, in 2016 that will be about $48,600 for a single person and $99,000 for a family of four. For those higher-income people, the penalty will average more than $2,000 a person, a pretty hefty bill for opting to remain uninsured. (If you want to see how large the penalty might be for a given situation, check out our ACA penalty calculator.)

The penalty tax could explain why more people obtained health insurance during this year’s open season than the administration projected. Once people focused on how much they’d have to pay if they didn’t get coverage, many may have decided to sign up. The impetus provided by the tax was undoubtedly much larger than the number of people paying it suggests.

8Comments

  1. Ralph H  ::  12:26 pm on June 12th, 2014:

    I think the large number of people signing up is due to both the huge number of policies canceled (after all they must have wanted insurance as they had self insured) and the freebies/ massively subsidized number of people with low income. I predict many more will sign up as small employers give up trying to offer insurance.

  2. Michael Bindner  ::  2:15 pm on June 12th, 2014:

    I had not heard that Virginia’s stubbornness about expanding Medicaid would help me not pay the penalty. This means that hospitals will pay the difference and not taxpayers who fund the penalty and pay the Meidicaid.

    It is bad news when people think they cannot sign or – or really cannot afford to. The unanticipated situation in the law is for a married couple, one person getting insurance through their employer and not adding the spouse – either because the family premium would be too high or because there is someething wrong in the marriage – or both. There should be an ability under the law for one spouse to apply for a separate subsidy, not counting the income or coverage of the other spouse. Do that and I will be on Mediciad in a second.

    The real answer, by the way, is for Obamacare to fail (does not look like it is) and for single-payer to take its place (maybe if the private health insurance companies falter).

  3. COMPANY CAR TAX TABLE 2014  ::  7:15 pm on June 14th, 2014:

    […] Good And Bad News About The ACA Penalty Tax – TaxVox […]

  4. 2014 TAX RATES  ::  10:19 pm on June 14th, 2014:

    […] Good And Bad News About The ACA Penalty Tax – TaxVox […]

  5. TAX UK 2014  ::  10:18 am on June 15th, 2014:

    […] Good And Bad News About The ACA Penalty Tax – TaxVox […]

  6. 2014 BEST TAX SOFTWARE  ::  9:16 pm on June 15th, 2014:

    […] Good And Bad News About The ACA Penalty Tax – TaxVox […]

  7. 2014 TAXES  ::  4:20 am on June 16th, 2014:

    […] Good And Bad News About The ACA Penalty Tax – TaxVox […]

  8. 50 Incredibly Useful Blogs on Tax Strategy and Tax Planning | Point Blank | Direct Capital  ::  10:17 am on July 29th, 2014:

    […] Good and Bad News About the ACA Penalty Tax […]