What Falling Oil Prices Will Mean for State Budgets

Oil prices are dropping…fast. This may be good news for drivers but not so good for a handful of states that use energy tax revenue to help fund their budgets. It may be especially challenging for states that rely on taxes from production of shale oil that uses methods that may be practical only at high prices. It costs $60 to $70 to produce a barrel of shale oil, leaving little margin once the price of crude dropped to the $75 range in November. Of course, the success of the controversial hydrofracking method which has opened up vast new reserves is one reason oil prices are so low.

On the positive side, with gas prices at a four year low, consumers have extra money in their pockets just in time for the holiday shopping season: more shopping means more state sales tax collections. If more travelers take to the roads, those long trips will also boost motor fuel tax collections (remember, gas taxes are generally fixed, and not tied to pump prices).

Low crude oil prices also lower the costs of surface transport, both rail and truck. Unfortunately, low prices may also boost short-term consumption of fossil fuel and may make buying gas-guzzlers more attractive.

Energy states will be affected in different ways, depending in part on how well they’ve projected prices—always a risky game. Among states that rely heavily on oil severance taxes, price forecasts for the current fiscal year range from $80 to $105 per barrel, depending on when the forecast was made.

Those states that projected prices on the low end should be able to manage without having to redo their 2015 budgets. For instance, North Dakota only publishes forecasts for the biennial budget and has not updated its projections since 2012. As a result, it’s forecasting $80-a-barrel oil and has built up over $5 billion in various reserve funds

Kansas revised its estimate this month, down to $80. Because its budget was based on the spring estimate of $85, it now expects to get about $9 million less than forecast. That’s a real problem—after large tax cuts, the state needs all the revenue it can get. Louisiana also revised the price down from $96 in May to $82 in November. This reduces energy revenues by $50 million in 2015. Other states forecast even higher prices, which could thrust their budget into disarray. Alaska, for instance, budgeted based on $105-a-barrel oil.

State

Date of Forecast

Price Forecast

Fiscal Year 2015 ($ per Barrel)

North Dakota December 2012 $80
Texas December 2013 $87
Alaska April 2014 $105
New Mexico August 2014 $92
Wyoming October 2014 $85
Louisiana November 2014 $82
Kansas November 2014 $80
Source: State reports (linked)

Alaska will be the big story to watch following outgoing Governor Sean Parnell’s controversial energy tax change, which escaped a repeal attempt last August. Before Parnell, Alaska used a model implemented by former Governor Sarah Palin, called the Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share Act (ACES)–a progressive tax with a low base rate that added surtaxes pegged to the price of oil. Parnell’s More Alaska Production Act (MAPA) has a base rate of 35 percent with no price triggers and significant credits for production.

When oil prices exceed about $90, the tax rate before credits is higher under ACES than under MAPA. But at lower prices, MAPA’s 35 percent flat rate is higher. With its budget based on $105 oil, Alaska already stood to get less revenue than expected, even with the boost from MAPA.

If lower oil prices reduce investment in production, energy state economies could suffer.   Alaska, North Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming have socked away a lot of money, so their current year budgets are not in any danger. But if prices stay low and producers stop drilling new wells, the oil boom towns in North Dakota and similar states could disappear as quickly as they popped up.  Oil producers may continue to pump existing wells, but there are fewer of the high paying jobs after the pumpjack starts and shale oil production falls off quickly if new drilling doesn’t sustain it.

Energy states can survive low prices, at least for a while. But a protracted downturn could begin to eat away at state budgets even as it puts more money in consumer’s pockets.


Reforming Corporate Taxation

The Cato Institute has organized an online forum to debate pro-growth economic policy reforms. Tax Policy Center scholars Bill Gale, Donald Marron, and Eric Toder have each contributed to the discussion. The U.S. corporate tax system is broken. The current method of taxing the profits of large, publicly traded corporations was designed for an economy […]


Votes and Consequences

With Congress away, the Daily Deduction will not publish for the rest of the week. We’ll be back as usual on Monday, December 1. Happy Thanksgiving!   In California, a tax increase breeds a budget battle and tuition hike. In 2012, Democratic Governor Jerry Brown successfully campaigned for reelection and Proposition 30: A tax increase […]


Bigger, Cleaner, and More Efficient: A Carbon-Corporate Tax Swap

The Cato Institute has organized an online forum to debate pro-growth economic policy reforms. Tax Policy Center scholars Bill Gale, Donald Marron, and Eric Toder have each contributed to the discussion. The United States could reduce its contribution to global climate change and increase domestic prosperity by taxing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse […]


Executive Privilege, Budget Consequences, and Rolling with the Taxes

Shutdown, Omnibus Spending, Continuing Resolution: So many choices in the wake of an Executive Action. The newly emboldened GOP (or is it?) has several options when responding to last night’s executive order on immigration issued by President Obama. After its Thanksgiving break, Congress will have until December 11 to decide. One thing is clear: more […]


Who Won the Election Again?

Pardon me for being confused. Two weeks ago, voters turned the Senate and several state houses over to Republicans and increased the GOP majority in the House. Now, in a new Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll, (firewall) Americans have firmly embraced—a Democratic agenda. They want more government spending on roads and Ebola, They want to […]


Get the Fiscal House in Order

The Cato Institute has organized an online forum to debate pro-growth economic policy reforms. Tax Policy Center scholars Bill Gale, Donald Marron, and Eric Toder have each contributed to the discussion. As policy makers search for ways to raise economic growth and improve the living standards of future generations, a major priority should be to get […]


New Chairs, New Resistance, and Maybe, New Taxes

As expected: Paul Ryan will succeed Dave Camp as House Ways & Means Chair. Representative Kevin Brady removed himself from consideration earlier this week, though he had more committee seniority. The full House GOP conference approved its  Steering Committee’s chairmanship recommendations, including Jason Chaffetz  to replace Darrell Issa on the Oversight and Government Reform panel […]


“Dead Reform Walking:” On Fairness, Immigration, and Spending

A Senator says “no way” to a bill that won’t see December’s light of day. As far as the lame-duck Congress is concerned, the Marketplace Fairness Act is dead: House Speaker John Boehner assured as much last week. Senator Ted Cruz has added his two cents (tax-free)  insisting it is  the “height of lunacy” to […]


Jim Poterba Wins Holland Award

The National Tax Association gave this year’s Dan Holland Medal for outstanding contributions to the study and practice of public finance to MIT professor Jim Poterba. Jim, who is also president of the National Bureau of Economic Research, is a terrific economist and one of the nicest people you’ll ever meet. To learn more about […]