Daily Deduction

from the Tax Policy Center

Infrastructure, Implied Messages, Inequality, and Inversions

By :: May 6th, 2014

On the Hill this morning: The Senate Finance Committee will explore “New Routes for Funding and Financing Highways and Transit” at a hearing this morning, in an effort to restore the dwindling Highway Trust Fund. Joseph Kile of the CBO, Secretary Aubrey Lane of the Virginia Department of Transportation, Jayan Dhru of Standard and Poor’s, Samara Barend of AECOM Capital, and Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute will appear.

The House will hold three symbolic tax votes this week. The GOP-controlled House will vote to make the research and experimentation tax credit permanent. It will also vote to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress and vote to urge the Justice Department to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the way the IRS treated conservative political groups seeking tax-exempt status. Message votes are hot these days.

So, in one case, is a message bill. Thanks to Democratic Representative Tony Cardenas’ latest bill, TPC’s Howard Gleckman reluctantly provides a tax policy-centric reaction to LA Clippers owner—and US taxpayer—Donald Sterling.

Chile may use tax reform to correct income inequality. Its president, Michelle Bachelet, enjoying a political majority in Congress, seeks to overhaul Chile’s tax system by closing loopholes for the wealthy and raising corporate taxes. Additional revenue, estimated in the billions, would fund free, universal education. Wonder what Thomas Piketty would say?

Location, location, location! Key to corporate tax reform? The number of US firms seeking a low-rate address through inversion is growing, with more attention on the practice thanks to the proposed Pfizer deal with AstraZeneca. An exception to a 2004 law allows a US firm to take a foreign address if merging with a non-U.S. partner that holds at least 25 percent of their combined market value. Could such attention prompt corporate tax reform? Wonder what Warren Buffet would say?

In case you missed them: more thoughts on inversions. Some economists in a roundtable discussion at the Fordham University School of Law suggest that a value added tax or lower corporate rates could reduce inversions. Fellow discussant, TPC’s Eric Toder, suggested a different approach: eliminate the corporate income tax and replace it with a tax on individual owners of publicly traded companies.

Interested in subscribing to The Daily Deduction, the Tax Policy Center summary of the day’s tax news? Sign-up here for free access. If you’d like to tell us about a new research paper or have any comments about our new feature, write us at dailydeduction@taxpolicycenter.org.

2Comments

  1. Michael Bindner  ::  2:07 am on May 7th, 2014:

    Taxing the owners of publicly traded companies is already done, unless he is talking about a wealth tax. I like the VAT idea better. Inversion is a function of tax law. Until we can at least change that as a source of tax evasion, no long term corporate tax reform should be undertaken – else we are rewarding bad behavior. I do not think we will be following Chile into tax reform any more than we will follow them into personal accounts for Social Security. I wonder who is doing their research? Unless there is some loophole that saves him, any fine Sterling gets a tax break for is more than offset by the capital gains taxes he will have to fork over. Lerner’s contempt of Congress resolution will die in the Senate, as do all the symbolic votes. I am not sure that the research and experimentation credit extenstions are just message votes – as they can be a vehicle in the Senate for the Bauchus bill or some negotiated solution between the two houses and possibly the White House. What is symbolic is the discussion on new routes to build roads. The answer is still raising the gas tax. All roads are in trouble, not just the highways.

  2. 2014 TAX FREE DAY  ::  10:20 am on May 7th, 2014:

    […] TaxVox » Blog Archive » Infrastructure, Implied Messages, Inequality … […]