Tax Policy in the Wrong Direction: Eliminating or Reducing State Income Tax

By :: March 27th, 2012

Oklahoma, Nebraska, and my home state of Kansas are debating proposals to sharply reduce or eliminate their personal income tax. That raises important questions about how they’ll make up the revenue. And it’s bad news for low-income families, who may end up paying higher taxes and losing critical safety net programs.

In 2009 (the latest year for which data are available), income taxes accounted for 27 percent of revenue in Kansas, 24 percent in Nebraska, and 17 percent  in Oklahoma, according to TPC’s State and Local Finance Data Query System (SLFDQS). Even if these states desire smaller government, it seems unlikely they’ll be able to make ends meet without the income tax as a significant source of revenues.

If other states without an income tax are any guide, it may mean these states will move to replace lost revenues with property and sales taxes, according to a report released by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

That may be problematic.  Low- and middle-income families tend to spend a greater proportion of their income on sales and property taxes than higher-income families. That’s because they typically spend more of their income on basic goods, while higher income families have the luxury of saving a larger share of their money. Many states with an income tax – including Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma - exempt families in poverty from the income tax. Without an income tax, these states lose an easy way to exempt low-income families from some tax. And even if income taxes are just scaled back considerably, the case with some proposals, opportunities to support low-income families dwindle. In the end, states that don’t have a personal income tax system tend to rely more on low- and middle-income families to pay for government.

None of these states is so flush with cash that large cuts ought to be considered. In 2010, Kansas raised its sales tax and cut spending to cover a projected shortfall. Nebraska projects a surplus this year, but enacted substantial budget cuts in the two prior years and Oklahoma is just starting to turn the corner on year over year revenue declines in FY09 and FY10.

Before going through with tax reform that could seriously limit or eliminate state incomes taxes, states ought to undergo a thorough analysis of exactly how much lost revenue will need to be replaced, and should give constituents an idea of how the replacement revenues will be raised – or what services will be cut. It could cause people to think a lot differently about the possibly exciting elimination or reduction of their state income tax.


  1. Tax Policy in the Wrong Direction: Eliminating or Reducing State Income Tax | Tax Information  ::  9:36 am on March 27th, 2012:

    […] original post here: Tax Policy in the Wrong Direction: Eliminating or Reducing State Income Tax Posted in News Tags: from-the-income, income, income-on-sales, kansas, low-income tax filers, […]

  2. economy  ::  10:07 am on March 27th, 2012:

    If a rapid-fire series of financing and real estate deals gets done in the next couple of weeks, filming of the movie “500 could begin in October.

  3. Michael Bindner  ::  5:18 pm on March 27th, 2012:

    If the state income tax is not particularly progressive, then replacing it with a Value Added Tax or VAT-like Net Business Receipts Tax would have the same impact. State levies are not generally known for high rates on their wealthiest citizens. Usually the rich pay the middle income rate, so I am not sure this is much of a loss – especially if repeal also is used as a chance to enact sales, rental and property tax rebates for lower income individuals.

  4. Michael Bindner  ::  5:19 pm on March 27th, 2012:

    This also makes sense if tax reform includes ending the state income tax deduction – which is not a rash assumption.

  5. business  ::  6:47 pm on March 27th, 2012:

    Great stuff, very well written!

  6. auto insurance in New Orleans LA  ::  2:19 pm on May 12th, 2013:

    Many factors can affect the rate, and your premium may be higher
    or lower. There are exceptions to the requirements
    of car insurance. Address: P.

  7. How Do You Feel After Ivf Trigger Kit | Better Than IVF  ::  11:03 pm on January 27th, 2015:

    […] RO MATRIX ? -You?re saying I can dodge bullets? ? -I?m saying when you make the financial equal of a nuclear impressive html5 water. Orange County, California already recycles in Cambridge and […]

  8. What Is The Current Research Status Of Embryonic Stem Cells | 30 Day IVF  ::  1:55 am on January 29th, 2015:

    […] The Nikkei 225 : The price, giving three years, amid optimism that the US financial. Com guide to inventory market indices. For instance Wall Avenue, i. Before requiring […]

  9. Have You Ever Really Loved A Woman Wrzuta Quickstep | Better Than IVF  ::  12:21 pm on January 29th, 2015:

    […] to the grounds that the Purchaser acknowledges that, for the purposes of section 1(2) however, by way of a credible payment historical past This being 30% , is a element that dealt with […]