102% Tax Rate? Really?

By :: February 8th, 2012

Investment manager James Ross last week told New York Times columnist James Stewart that his combined federal, state, and local tax rate was 102 percent.  No doubt, Ross did pay a lot of tax to the feds and the two New Yorks, city and state. But did he really pay more than all of his income in tax?

No, he did not.

As Stewart made clear past the wildly misleading headline (“At 102%, His Tax Rate Takes the Cake”), Ross’s tax bills totaled 102 percent of his taxable income, a measure that omits all exclusions, exemptions, and deductions. Using that reduced measure of income inflates Ross’s effective tax rate far above the share of his total income he paid in taxes.

Deeper into his column, Stewart explains that Ross’s tax bill was just 20 percent of his adjusted gross income (AGI), a more inclusive measure that does not subtract out exemptions and deductions. Because he took advantage of many preferences, Ross’s taxable income was only a fifth of his AGI, resulting in that inflated 102 percent tax rate. But even AGI doesn’t include all income. Among other things, it leaves out tax-exempt interest on municipal bonds, contributions to retirement accounts, and the earnings of those accounts. Ross almost surely paid less than 20 percent of his total income in taxes

Stewart’s article demonstrates the common confusion about effective tax rates, or ETRs. There are many ETRs, depending on which taxes you count and against what income you measure them. Including more taxes drives up ETRs. Using a broader measure of income drives them down. And interpreting what a specific ETR means requires a clear understanding of both the tax and income measures used.

The Tax Policy Center has just released new tables that demonstrate what happens to ETRs when you include more taxes and or use alternative income measures. In 2011, for example, the federal individual income tax averaged 11.5 percent of AGI but just 9.3 percent of total cash income, the much broader measure of income that TPC generally uses for its analyses. Adding payroll taxes boosted those ETRs to 20.4 percent of AGI but just 16.5 percent of cash income.

The highest income 20 percent of households paid an average of 17.3 percent of AGI in individual income taxes in 2011. That’s the measure the media used recently when they reported the tax rates paid by Mitt Romney (13.7 percent), Newt Gingrich (31.5 percent), and Barack Obama (24.1 percent). Measured as a share of the broader cash income measure, ETRs for the top 20 percent are lower—just 14.9 percent. We don’t know total cash income for Romney, Gingrich, or Obama so we can’t compare their ETRs under this measure.

Add in payroll taxes—both employer and employee shares—and the highest income households paid 20.9 percent of their cash income in taxes. And if you tack on their shares of the corporate income tax and the estate tax, their effective tax rate hit 24.5 percent.

Now look at middle-income households. In 2011, they paid 4.1 percent of their AGI in income taxes but just 3.2 percent of their cash income—nearly 12 percentage points less than the rich. The income tax is quite progressive. Include regressive payroll taxes and their ETR jumps to 12.1 percent, about 9 percentage points less than the highest income households.  Add their (relatively modest) share of corporate income and estate taxes, and their ETR is only slightly higher—12.6 percent, or about half that for the top 20 percent.

The bottom line is you can use these numbers to tell many different stories, some more valid than others, depending on the taxes you include and the income measure you use. The broadest measure of income provides the most meaningful gauge of the relative impact of taxes on households. Narrower measures can yield absurd results—James Ross didn’t pay 102 percent of his income in taxes—and ignore important differences in households’ ability to pay.

It’s fine to tell those different stories but essential that any analysis compares equivalent ETRs, calculated for the same taxes using the same income measure. Combining apples and oranges may make a good fruit salad but it yields poor analysis.



  1. The 102% Tax Rate and Other Perils Measuring Tax Rates « Donald Marron  ::  6:19 pm on February 8th, 2012:

    […] at the Tax Policy Center’s blog, TaxVox, my colleague Roberton Williams examines the pitfalls that afflict some efforts to measure a person’s tax rate: Investment […]

  2. SteveinCH  ::  8:33 pm on February 8th, 2012:

    And yet, with much more publicity around his claim, TPC did not see fit to publish a similar critique of Warren Buffett who used exactly the same denominator in his comparison between himself and his secretary.


  3. Michael Bindner  ::  10:58 am on February 9th, 2012:

    This comlexity is all the more reason why taxation should be shifted from employees to consumers and employers, with only the highest income individuals paying a personal income surtax.

  4. David @ Engage America  ::  11:09 am on February 9th, 2012:

    Based on the TPC’s analysis of effective tax rates the federal tax code seems to be very progressive despite the constant quoting of the few people whose tax rates don’t fall in line with the numbers.

    What does this mean for the way we should approach federal tax reform?

  5. Adam Boatsman  ::  3:36 pm on February 11th, 2012:

    Great post – reminder of why a flat tax would likely be problematic – yet how would one go about creating a single jurisdication or have meaningful reform that effectives other taxes (e.g. ad valorum, sales, excise, payroll).

  6. clarks  ::  8:47 pm on April 26th, 2012:

    Since their humble beginning back in 1825 Clarks shoes has built upon their reputation for quality by continuously revolutionizing the comfort footwear industry.From their inception,the Clarks brand has been synonymous with comfort,quality and style.Utilizing a wide range of high quality leathers and a surprisingly fresh approach to shoe design,Clarks continues to offer a broad range of fashionable shoe styles for both clarks mens shoes and clarks women shoes.Whether your looking for a casual leather flip flop,a unique slide,or comfortable casual dress shoe Clarks is sure to have the right style for you.

    As always,Clarks uk shoes continues to use only the finest leather,suede and nubuck in each and every shoe.Recently,the introduction of the unstructured series has offered consumers a number of innovative and exciting styles that utilize the Clarks Sandals exclusive Air Circulation System™.The ACS system controls the interior climate of the shoe by allowing warm air to dissipate while cool air is pulled in.Additionally,Clarks sale Unstructured shoes are thoughtfully designed to be softly cushioned and have an exceptionally lightweight flexible construction that allows you to move about more freely and naturally.

    By purchasing a pair of Clarks originals shoes you will be joining a tradition of quality,comfort and style that has stood the test of time.

  7. barbour  ::  9:24 pm on April 26th, 2012:

    In sixteen twenty-one, a big celebration of barbour jacket took place at Plymouth Colony in what is now the state of Massachusetts. European settlers known as the barbour jackets were celebrating their autumn harvest after a winter of struggle.
    Other colonists held earlier ceremonies of thanks. But the Pilgrims’ three-day feast is often called the nation’s first barbour outlet Thanksgiving. President Abraham Lincoln declared a national holiday in eighteen sixty-three during the Civil War.
    Today families and friends gather on the fourth Thursday in November. And, thanks to the barbour quilted jacket United States Census Bureau, here are some facts about where their Thanksgiving meal comes from.
    The main dish is traditionally a turkey. About two-thirds of the nation’s turkeys are produced in Minnesota and five other quilted barbour jackets tates. Producers are expected to raise two hundred forty-eight million birds this year, two percent more than last year.
    Popular side dishes include cranberries and sweet potatoes. Last year North Carolina barbour sale grew more sweet potatoes than any other state. Wisconsin is expected to be the top cranberry producer this year.
    People often finish the meal with pumpkin pie. Last year Illinois grew the most pumpkins. California, New York, Ohio and barbour uk were also major pumpkin producers.
    Thanksgiving is a big event, but buying a barbour mens traditional holiday meal can be a struggle for the poor. So charity groups often hold food drives to collect food forbarbour ladies low-income families.

  8. sale_007  ::  2:54 am on April 27th, 2012:

    Few watch aficionados realize that the Japanese brand seiko watch has a history as old as many of its Swiss rivals. Founded in the 1880s, the company began manufacturing wrist seiko watches after World War I and quickly became an innovative leader, developing one of the world’s first seiko automatic and seiko chronograph. But perhaps Seiko’s greatest achievement came about in its race with the American brand Bulova to harness new technology, leading to the quartz watch, which revolutionized the industry and nearly drove the Swiss out of business.
    More innovations followed, including the first computer wristwatch, in 1984, and the first nonbattery seiko kinetic watch. To this list we can now add another groundbreaker: the Seiko Spring Drive mechanical movement, which is accurate to one second per day, making it approximately three times more precise than the average mechanical watch. The Spring Drive also provides an enduring seventy-two hours of power reserve (most watches offer about forty) and winds 30 percent faster than a conventional movement.
    According to seiko uk, twenty-eight years of work went into developing this movement, and only five of the company’s hundreds of watchmakers possess the requisite skills to assemble it. Regardless of its technological history, the seiko 5 is a skillfully designed watch, with graceful hands and interesting use of off-center dials.

  9. watches brand  ::  8:48 pm on October 6th, 2013:

    Worthwhile information. Happy myself I uncovered your web site unintentionally, and i’m stunned the reason why this collision couldn’t happened earlier! I personally book marked that.

  10. Morning Must Reads: Energy | TIME.com  ::  6:26 pm on November 13th, 2013:

    […] No, this guy did not pay 102% of his income in taxes. […]

  11. bet365 bonus code uk  ::  5:55 pm on February 5th, 2014:

    If some one wishes to be updated with latest technologies therefore he must be visit
    this website and be up to date everyday.

  12. 5Dimes Promo Code  ::  8:22 pm on February 5th, 2014:

    You can definitely see your expertise within the article
    you write. The world hopes for more passionate
    writers like you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe.
    Always go after your heart.

  13. online poker  ::  10:15 am on February 7th, 2014:

    It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d
    certainly donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your
    RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about
    this site with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  14. where to play beating micro stakes poker  ::  1:21 am on February 9th, 2014:

    I loved as much as you will receive carried out right
    here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that
    you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly
    again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  15. http://hackdownloadonline.blogspot.com/  ::  10:26 pm on February 25th, 2014:

    Awesome! Its really awesome paragraph, I have got much
    clear idea about from this article.

  16. tapzilla.com  ::  12:21 am on April 30th, 2014:


    TaxVox » Blog Archive » 102% Tax Rate? Really?