The Coming Flood of Estate Tax Returns

By :: November 30th, 2011

 Fewer than 3,300 estates will owe federal estate tax this year, the smallest number in more than 75 years (other than 2010 when the tax disappeared for the year). But, paradoxically, even as Congress shrinks the number of taxable estates, the law also encourages many more estates to file returns—even if they owe no tax. That will increase costs to those who want to do prudent estate planning, keep their planners and lawyers busy, and swamp the IRS with many times the number of returns filed in recent years.

The reason: the portability provision in the 2010 Tax Relief Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act that allows surviving spouses to claim on their own estate tax returns any exemption not used by their spouses. The 2011 exemption is $5 million. If a husband dies this year and leaves an estate with a taxable value of $3 million, his estate owes no tax and his wife’s estate may claim the unused $2 million exemption when she dies. Thus, if the $5 million exemption remains in effect, her estate could avoid tax on its first $7 million.

Portability—that is, retaining that unused exemption—has its price, though: A surviving spouse must file an estate tax return that specifically provides for portability on time, whether or not the estate owes any tax. Otherwise, the extra exemption is lost forever. (And, curiously, the decedent or the executor may specifically deny portability on the return, thus making it unavailable to the surviving spouse.)

Filing such a return is a no-brainer for couples with large estates that are close to the current $10 million combined tax threshold. Preserving the unused exemption will save future taxes if the survivor’s estate grows past the amount of an individual exemption.

But many smaller estates could also benefit from holding on to the unused exemption. In 2013, the estate tax is scheduled to revert to its pre-2001 form with a $1 million exemption and a 55 percent top tax rate. President Obama and Congress may not allow that to happen but might adopt an exemption below $5 million. For example, the president has repeatedly proposed reverting to the 2009 estate tax parameters: a $3.5 million exemption and a 45 percent tax rate. Having a spouse’s unused exemption available could save the survivor’s estate hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Of course, Congress also could take away the unused exemption in future estate tax legislation. Estates would undoubtedly challenge that change in court and might or might not win. But without keeping the portability option open, they’d clearly have no case.

I suspect that estate tax attorneys are hard at work, explaining to their clients the benefit to filing an estate tax return even if the law doesn’t require one. The nine-months-after-death deadline for filing returns has already expired for people who died early this year and more estates miss the deadline each day.

How many and by how much surviving spouses will benefit from portability is uncertain. What is sure, however, is that the IRS will have to process a lot more returns and attorneys will have a lot more business preparing them.


  1. AMTbuff  ::  10:05 am on November 30th, 2011:

    I learned something today. Thanks!!

  2. Michael Bindner  ::  11:28 am on November 30th, 2011:

    This is another good reason for a VAT. Estate tax exemptions have no effect on whether this tax is paid. What is amazing is how the 400 richest families bundle contributions through ATR to pay upwards of $100,000 per election cycle per individual donor to keep these tax preferences alive. It would be so much easier to tax only cash disbursements from inheritances (with no tax for an asset held or sold to a qualified ESOP). If the tax rate were low enough, it would make no sense to continue playing protection money to Grover Norquist.

  3. Lee  ::  1:47 pm on November 30th, 2011:

    Good article. Rep. McDermott’s new estate tax bill, H.R. 3467, also has a spousal portability provision, along with a lower exemption of $1 million/individual, $2 million/married couple, along the lines of the pre-Bush estate tax.

    I have a question on the data in the Historical Returns as Percentage of Deaths table you cite. It says “Data for 2005 to 2009 are estimates.” When the IRS publishes tables of the number of estates paying the tax through 2010, why do you use estimates?

  4. Estate Tax Issues :Austin Attorney  ::  10:15 pm on November 30th, 2011:

    […] Tax is Government-Sanctioned Estate LootingTax 360Important New Tax Issues and Wealth ManagementTaxVox […]

  5. cars  ::  7:17 pm on May 28th, 2013:

    All large purchases are always intimidating, especially if you are uninformed
    about the industry. One of the scariest purchases is
    buying cars. Many people fear they are getting ripped off and you surely don’t want that. Avoid buying a lemon by looking through these great tips and tricks regarding car purchases.