Secret Campaign Giving and Abusing the Tax Law

By :: October 26th, 2010

The two big stories of this campaign season are voter backlash against Democrats and the rise of the so-called Super PACs-- massive campaign funding organizations that use the tax law to protect the anonymity of their donors. These money laundries, organized as 501(c)(4) groups under the Internal Revenue Code, violate the spirit of the tax laws and may well violate the letter of the law as well. But they are getting a pass from the Internal Revenue Service.
The biggest and best known is Crossroads Grassroots Political Strategies, organized by GOP strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie. Grassroots says it aims to raise an unprecedented $65 million in this year’s election cycle—nearly all of it anonymous. But the concept is not new.
It was first used by Democrats in the 1990s and this year supporters of both parties have created scores of these outfits. This year’s Supreme Court decision in the Citizen’s United case made these organizations even more attractive by opening the door to unlimited giving by businesses and unions.
The tax law is relatively clear about what a (c)(4) can and cannot do. The IRS defines these groups as “civic leagues, social welfare organizations, and local associations of employees.” Their net earnings are supposed to be used for charitable, educational, or recreational purposes. They may lobby and participate in political activities (unlike 501 (c)(3s) but campaigning must not be the group’s primary purpose.
It is, of course, absurd to suggest that the main purpose of these groups is anything other than political activity. Indeed, they effectively function as arms of the Democratic and Republican parties. The biggest, such as Rove’s group, give 100 percent of their contributions to one party or the other.
What could the IRS do about it? According to Ohio State tax professor Donald Tobin, quite a lot actually. (Thanks to the TaxProf blog for posting this). It could subject the donors to the gift tax. It could reclassify these groups as Sec. 527 organizations, which would require them to name their sugar daddies. It could sanction the lawyers who give the green-light to these outfits. Another option: The IRS could sanction the SuperPACs groups themselves and make them pay tax on those funds they improperly contribute to campaigns.
So why doesn’t the IRS act? There are lots of reasons. These groups are a political hot potato. The agency is chronically short-staffed and cracking down on them would produce relatively little revenue. Besides, the new (c)(4)s won’t even have to file their first returns until at least January 2012, so the agency today knows little about them. Most important, perhaps, it is not the IRS’ job to enforce campaign finance laws. That is supposed to be the role of the Federal Elections Commission, an agency carefully organized to be entirely ineffective.
In the end, this is a problem for Congress, not the IRS. The tax exemption is a valuable tool for these political fronts. They should be made to pay for the privilege by either refraining from campaign activity or disclosing their donors. If they won’t, Congress should take away their special tax treatment.
CORRECTION: As one of our commenters noted, these groups are not Super PACs.

31Comments

  1. Anonymous  ::  8:33 pm on October 26th, 2010:

    The only way Congress will revoke their special tax treatment is in a lame duck session, unless the Democrats retain the House (which is more likely than is reported, since retention is not newsworthy until it happens). Of course, if Congress does stay in Democratic hands next week, expect hearings on this issue under the lesson of “never wound a king.”

  2. Promosyon  ::  8:22 am on March 8th, 2011:

    Don’t you publish some writings which critise you? You didn’t publish my critics upon your blog.

  3.   ::  5:05 am on March 31st, 2011:

    Might I simply say nice to read a relief to find somebody who definitely understands exactly what they may be discussing on the internet. You actually get experience to bring a problem to light and enable it to be important. Even more people should study it and understand it all side of the story. I cant believe you are not more popular because you clearly have the gift.

  4. promosyon  ::  9:21 am on July 12th, 2011:

    Thanks for sharing. Good job.

  5. flaş bellek  ::  12:30 pm on November 3rd, 2011:

    Thanks to this great article extruded to my knowledge.

  6. promosyon  ::  8:34 am on November 5th, 2011:

    Good job and thanks for great article.

  7. ptc  ::  10:59 pm on March 15th, 2012:

    Your blog is fantastic and your thought of advice is very good.

  8. The IRS Was Wrong — But Many Political Groups Should Not Be Tax-Exempt | TIME.com  ::  5:46 am on May 14th, 2013:

    […] I wrote in a blog post back in 2010, the tax law is relatively clear about what a (c)(4) can and cannot do. The IRS […]

  9. ACROSS THE FADER – BIZ – The IRS Was Wrong — But Many Political Groups Should Not Be Tax-Exempt  ::  11:35 am on May 14th, 2013:

    […] I wrote in a blog post back in 2010, the tax law is relatively clear about what a (c)(4) can and cannot do. The IRS […]

  10. The Real Villain in the IRS Scandal  ::  5:38 pm on May 14th, 2013:

    […] about porous laws governing political groups and weak IRS enforcement of those laws. In a 2010 blog post, Gleckman called politically focused 501(c)(4) groups “money laundries” that “violate the […]

  11. Anonymous  ::  8:38 pm on May 14th, 2013:

    […] […]

  12. Congress Should Get The IRS Out Of The Business Of Regulating Political Speech – Forbes – business news online | Fonte English  ::  3:34 pm on May 16th, 2013:

    […] digit hand, it has been low push to fissure downbound on what whatever wager as abuses (I wrote a Tax Vox blog urging the authority to behave backwards in 2010). Yet, when it tried, it was justifiedly accused […]

  13. Congress Should Get The IRS Out Of The Business Of Regulating Political Speech – Forbes – business news online  ::  4:03 pm on May 16th, 2013:

    […] digit hand, it has been low push to fissure downbound on what whatever wager as abuses (I wrote a Tax Vox blog urging the authority to behave backwards in 2010). Yet, when it tried, it was justifiedly accused […]

  14. Congress Should Get The IRS Out Of The Business Of Regulating Political Speech | NewsCred Plugin Dev Site  ::  4:19 pm on May 16th, 2013:

    […] On one hand, it has been under pressure to crack down on what some see as abuses (I wrote a Tax Vox blog urging the agency to act back in 2010). Yet, when it tried, it was rightly accused of political […]

  15. Congress Should Get The IRS Out Of The Business Of Regulating Political Speech – BusinessWorld Ads  ::  4:48 pm on May 16th, 2013:

    […] On one hand, it has been under pressure to crack down on what some see as abuses (I wrote a Tax Vox blog urging the agency to act back in 2010). Yet, when it tried, it was rightly accused of political […]

  16. Congress Should Get The IRS Out Of The Business Of Regulating Political Speech. | InterViewDvd MagaZine Blog  ::  5:22 pm on May 18th, 2013:

    […] On one hand, it has been under pressure to crack down on what some see as abuses (I wrote a Tax Vox blogurging the agency to act back in 2010). Yet, when it tried, it was rightly accused of political […]

  17. Klara  ::  6:42 pm on May 18th, 2013:

    JS

  18. Congress Should Get The IRS Out Of The Business Of Regulating Political Speech | primakseft.cz  ::  9:38 pm on May 18th, 2013:

    […] On one hand, it has been under pressure to crack down on what some see as abuses (I wrote a Tax Vox blog urging the agency to act back in 2010). Yet, when it tried, it was rightly accused of political […]

  19. IRS Impeachment Issue or Election Advocacy | lablouisianaboy  ::  9:34 pm on May 20th, 2013:

    […] Gleckman wrote this blog entry for the Tax Policy Center back in 2010 where he addressed the issue and offered the […]

  20. price of celine trapeze bag  ::  7:50 pm on June 30th, 2013:

    Just wanna comment that you have a very nice site, I enjoy the style it actually stands out.

  21. tengowarez.com  ::  10:25 am on July 5th, 2013:

    Somebody necessarily lend a hand to make critically posts I would state.
    That is the first time I frequented your website page and
    thus far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this particular submit amazing.
    Wonderful job!

  22. nike fußballschuhe  ::  8:34 am on June 11th, 2014:

    My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from
    PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the
    costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress
    on various websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform.

    I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it?
    Any help would be really appreciated!

    Here is my web site nike fußballschuhe

  23. Bertram  ::  5:06 am on August 21st, 2014:

    I think the admin of this site is in fact working hard in favor of
    his web page, for the reason that here every data is quality based material.

  24. victoria secret nederland online  ::  4:35 am on October 1st, 2014:

    Pretty! This has been a really wonderful article. Many thanks for
    providing this information.

  25. http://elsafrozengames.net/  ::  1:08 am on October 3rd, 2014:

    It’s awesome to go to see this web page and reading the views
    of all mates regarding this paragraph, while I am also keen of
    getting knowledge.

  26. http://k2t2.com/  ::  2:04 pm on October 3rd, 2014:

    You could certainly see your expertise within the work you write.

    The sector hopes for more passionate writers such
    as you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart.

  27. gungames4u  ::  1:07 am on October 4th, 2014:

    When someone writes an post he/she retains the thought of a user in his/her brain that how a
    user can know it. Thus that’s why this paragraph is outstdanding.
    Thanks!

  28. http://babyhazelgame.co.in/  ::  5:59 am on October 4th, 2014:

    Hello, I think your site might be having browser compatibility
    issues. When I look at your blog site in Chrome, it looks fine but
    when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, terrific blog!

  29. Free Slots  ::  1:58 pm on October 21st, 2014:

    If you attend an expensive college while you not necessarily completely certain just what career
    you happen to be needing, then you could end up in a lot of financial debt.
    If you are wondering why roulette is transformed into online gaming
    community, then it is because gamers all around the world could interact with gamers not within their area.
    Customer Service: You shouldn’t game at a casino which
    doesn’t make customer service a priority.

  30. berk  ::  11:01 am on December 14th, 2014:

    sık ve kalıtelı ahsap saatler mutlaka gozatınız

  31. Malorie Berretti  ::  3:47 pm on April 1st, 2015:

    AWESOME

    http://www.naija.com