Re: Re: Paul Ryan’s Consumption Tax
by Anonymous
OOPS, error in my math. The modified tax where the employee tax and payroll tax were added to the subtraction VAT would be 23.8% (10% individual, 5.3% payroll (non-elederly retirement/survivors), and his 8.5% VAT). While this would be the simplest, again, it would not include the ability to provide subsidies for larger families, leaving such families at an economic disadvantage - or worse leaving their employers at such a disadvantage because they could not pay a living wage to them even if they were inclined to do so. Indeed, the incentive would be stronger to fire workers with families and seniority and hire kids out school for whom the smaller wage goes farther. This already happens in the software industry and it is a nasty practice that could be discouraged by a larger child credit.
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.