Re: Re: The $250,000 Question
by Anonymous
The other option is to clip tax expenditures on the non-AMT side as a way to finance AMT reform. Many of these tax expenditures were put in with full knowledge that they could never really be taken. It was easier to rely on the AMT than to put in descent tax expenditure caps - thus preserving comity on the tax writing comities against interest group driven charges of "class warfare." That being said, I am not sure there is a way out of this - since the action required would be capping tax expenditures and facing up to those charges. That would take political courage and I just don't see that in abundance.
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.