|
|
|||
|
Re: Obama's $300 Billion Tax Cut: Lots of Buck, Not Much Bang
by
Anonymous
How to spend 1 trillion dollars.
Since corp tax cuts essentially have a small multiplier, and there's only so many roads to build, I have a proposal:
more energy efficient retrofits.
Both for large buildings and for residential. Essentially expand current programs for subsidizing home retrofits for the elderly, poor.
I see this plan having many positives:
1) Since most of these projects are labor intensive, I can see this having an immediate impact on unemployment (especially soaking up skilled construction labor which is otherwise laying idle right now).
2) B/c this program is feeding money to working-class folks (who tend to spend a greater % of income) this money will have a higher multiplier and greater effect on economy.
3) It will also have a multiplier of sorts for the resident/owner. Money saved on energy bills will be available to spend in the economy at large. -- Let's take fairly conservative numbers. 10% energy savings as percent of initial cost of retrofit. Let's say half of that savings goes back into increased utility consumption (there is a demand curve after all). So, for every dollar spent, you're getting an extra 5%. And that's a conservative estimate.
4) The efficiency savings in 3) will exist year after year, providing future stimulus of sorts--important in the face of a multi-year recession. In addition, strategically, the US will be more broadly prepared for whenever the next energy price spike happens.
I see this plan broadly applicable to both home owners and businesses/industry. In addition, if the US might dress this as an incentive plan, with dollar-for-dollar matching with private companies, e.g., to help ensure that only needed retrofits/upgrades are pursued.
|
Posts and comments are solely the opinion of the author and not that of the Tax Policy Center, Urban Institute, or Brookings Institution. Read the Terms of Participation Recent Entries
Login
Search
Month Archive
|
||
|
|
|||


