|
|
|||
|
Re: Stimulus: Treat the Disease, Not the Symptoms
by
Shared Growth
Confessions of a Job Exporter
I am one of the people who decides to locate jobs outside of the U.S.
Specifically, I am the head of tax for a U.S. multinational. It is my job
to advise that high value manufacturing and research should, from a tax
point of view, be located outside of this country. I advise that it is
better to invest cash in foreign operations than in American ones. If the
recent tax proposal of House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rangel
becomes law, I will advise that good administrative jobs should be moved
out of the U.S. I don't like giving that advice, but under current law
that's what the numbers dictate. I want to change that.
Of course tax isn't the only thing that governs the decision on where to
put operations. My company has a set of activities that we can afford to
keep in the U.S. out of loyalty, but if we did too much of that we'd be
acquired by another (probably foreign) company. For the rest of the
operations, it's just math - add up relative labor and transportation costs
and the cost of materials, figure in tax, and that tells you where to
locate, excluding places with homicidal or corrupt governments. For the
highest tech, highest profit operations, though - the ones that involve the
best jobs - tax becomes dominant.
U.S. law currently provides that most income earned abroad is only taxed by
the U.S. when you bring the cash home. So, if you make $100 in America you
only keep $65 after the U.S. 35% corporate tax, but you keep the full $100
if you earn it in the Dominican Republic. When you reinvest that $100 of
D.R. cash you can use the full $100 if you invest abroad, but only $65 if
you invest in America, due to the U.S. tax bite. So you invest in new
foreign operations, not American ones.
Changing the law to tax the D.R. operations currently would not work.
America is not the only economy that counts any more, and most countries do
not tax foreign earnings at all. If the U.S. immediately taxed foreign
earnings, our companies would get acquired or crushed by competitors, and
we'd just lose our headquarters jobs. Like it or not, it is a global
economy now, and this country does not control it.
But there is a simple solution that works. Give corporations a deduction
for dividends they pay, and make up the tax revenue by getting rid of
special rates for capital gains and by imposing a 7½% tax on individual
income over $500,000 a year, which is all it takes to be revenue neutral.
That would make the U.S. the best location in the world for high value
operations. It would restore our economy and give middle class workers
market power.
There are plenty of proposals circulating for ways to stimulate our weak
economy. The American people need to demand a real, long term solution.
Change the rules so that I can tell my employer to put all the best jobs
here.
Matt Lykken is a tax attorney and is Director of SharedEconomicGrowth.org.
Details of the proposal can be found at www.sharedeconomicgrowth.org
|
Posts and comments are solely the opinion of the author and not that of the Tax Policy Center, Urban Institute, or Brookings Institution. Read the Terms of Participation Recent Entries
Login
Search
Month Archive
|
||
|
|
|||


