|
|
|||
|
by
Eric Toder
on Wed 30 Sep 2009 04:05 PM EDT
What is a tax? You would think a senior economist at the Tax Policy Center would have no trouble answering that question. But it is not so simple.
This question has come up in the debate over the proposal to require all Americans to have medical insurance—a provision in all of the major congressional health reform bills. If you must buy insurance, is the payment you make a tax or just a premium for insurance coverage? Is the penalty imposed on those who don’t buy insurance a tax or a fine for failing to comply with the law?
more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Tue 29 Sep 2009 03:56 PM EDT
Democrats are proposing to control future Medicare costs, and Republicans are trying to stop them. Who knew?
This could have been the perfect “Nixon in China” moment. Democrats—who created Medicare and for decades resisted GOP moves to curb the program—control Congress and the White House. A Democratic President has embraced modest efforts to slow the program’s unsustainable rate of growth. Drug makers, doctors, and hospitals all swallow hard and buy into the idea. It could be the perfect moment for a bit of desperately needed fiscal responsibility.
more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Thu 24 Sep 2009 04:54 PM EDT
We’ve been hearing an awful lot lately about big government taking over the health insurance business. But there may be no commercial transaction in the country more heavily subsidized than housing. And now, many of the very people who are in a panic over government interference in medical care want to increase Washington’s role in home ownership. more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Tue 22 Sep 2009 04:40 PM EDT
Years ago, when I first started writing about health care, I came across a press release that said three new cardiac centers had opened in a Midwestern city and that, as a result, the costs of heart care in that town were expected to rise. This seemed contrary to all I had ever learned about supply and demand. But it was a powerful lesson. Health care economics, it turns out, is an oxymoron. The normal rules don’t apply. more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Thu 17 Sep 2009 02:02 PM EDT
One of our readers, Kevin, wrote to say he was confused by my description yesterday of the premium subsidy in Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus’ health reform plan as a tax credit. “It sounds like a voucher to me,” he wrote.
Sounds like a voucher to me too. Except it isn’t. The proposal would work like this: Everyone would be required to buy insurance, and low- and moderate-income people would get a government subsidy to help out with the premiums. The subsidy, however, is designed as a refundable tax credit paid directly to insurers. The size of the credit is based on an immensely complicated sliding scale.
more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Wed 16 Sep 2009 04:04 PM EDT
Lots for tax wonks to chew over in Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus’ health bill. The measure, which has yet to garner any Republican support, is already being called an opening gambit and is likely to be revised as it heads to committee markup next week. Still, it is an indication of how intertwined tax and health policy have become in recent years. Here are some of the key provisions:
more »
by
Eric Toder
on Tue 15 Sep 2009 02:21 PM EDT
Last weekend, while tea party protestors flocked to Washington to complain about taxes and big government, I was meeting in Toronto with other tax policy wonks for two days of technical discussions on tax expenditures: tax-code provisions that target special benefits to selected taxpayers or activities. And we found that, increasingly, the big government the tea party people fear is doing its business through this pseudo-spending.
more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Thu 10 Sep 2009 12:11 PM EDT
As rhetoric, President Obama’s speech last night was an A+. As policy, it was the clearest description we’ve yet heard of what he really wants. As a step towards getting a bill passed...we’ll see. Here are some thoughts about what the President said.
After a summer of confusion, Obama told us what he wants health reform to look like: Everyone would be able to buy insurance at a reasonable price, regardless of health status; everyone would have to purchase coverage; government subsidies would be available to help many (though not all) of the uninsured buy coverage; and any bill would be fully funded. This is insurance restructuring, not system reform. Still, if Washington can pull it off, it would be a very impressive achievement.
more »
by
Eric Toder
on Wed 09 Sep 2009 11:46 AM EDT
A review of books on Bernie Madoff in a recent Sunday Washington Post caught my eye because it reminded me of a high school friend. The review describes an assignment given to Madoff and his high school classmates in the 1950s to read a book of his choosing and make an oral report in class. Bernie didn’t get a book read, and when his turn came in class invented and described a non-existent book. When asked to produce the book, he explained he didn’t have it because he had already returned it to the library! And, although some of his classmates were suspicious, no one turned him in. Thus began the career of the great fraudster. more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Tue 08 Sep 2009 10:31 AM EDT
Before you give up entirely on the idea of health reform, take a look at the Healthy Americans Act, a broad-based reform bill with some interesting tax provisions sponsored by senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Robert Bennett (R-Utah).
more »
by
Eric Toder
on Fri 04 Sep 2009 02:33 PM EDT
Howard Gleckman made a strong case yesterday for repealing the provision that allows unlimited conversions of traditional (deductible) IRAs into Roth accounts beginning next year. Today, Len Burman adds the totally sensible suggestion that Congressional scorekeepers display the present value costs of such provisions, so we’ll know that they cost the government money in the long run despite the short-run revenue pickup in the budget window.
more »
by
Len Burman
on Fri 04 Sep 2009 12:10 PM EDT
Yesterday, Howard explained why the Roth rollover loophole, set to open in 2010, is horrible policy. By pre-paying tax on accumulated IRAs, rich folks can effectively increase their tax-free savings by close to half. (My 2006 article explains this point.) And the rollover option is worth most to people who don’t actually need retirement accounts to finance their old age.
more »
by
Howard Gleckman
on Thu 03 Sep 2009 04:29 PM EDT
High-income investors are about to enjoy a massive tax windfall from Uncle Sam. In just a few months, they’ll be able to convert their Individual Retirement Accounts--where investment earnings are taxable at withdrawal-- to Roth IRAs-- where they are tax-free. As financial planners are happily telling their big-ticket clients, this will be the gift that keeps on giving.
more »
|
Posts and comments are solely the opinion of the author and not that of the Tax Policy Center, Urban Institute, or Brookings Institution. Read the Terms of Participation Recent Entries
Login
Search
Month Archive
|
||
|
|
|||


