Right after the housing bill was signed, I opened up my personal e-mail to find this:

Dear friends,

Great News!! President Bush just signed into law the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. This is a major victory for REALTORS®, consumers, and our nation!

Homebuyers will soon have access to more affordable financing, and first-time homebuyers (those who have not owned a home for three years) will receive a tax-credit to help them enter the market. For more details on all of the provisions in the new law, please use the link below.

How a realtor in Milpitas got my e-mail address, I don’t know, but she sure is convinced that the new law will bring buyers back into the market. But is the first-time homebuyers’ credit really a good deal for consumers and our nation?

Unlike other credits, the new one is really a 15 year interest-free loan. Qualifying buyers will get a refundable credit of the smaller of 10 percent of their purchase price or $7,500 for homes bought between April 2008 and June 30, 2009. Because they don’t get the credit until they file a tax return—and not when they buy the house—it’s unclear how much the cash windfall will help with down payments—which presumably was the whole idea. And interest-free doesn’t mean free: they must pay the money back to the government over 15 years.

You can see why real estate agents and homebuilders love it. It fairly screams: Buy now and get $7500 off! But you must act fast! Assuming we are no longer in a world with no-money-down home purchases, what would the new credit really do?

For people who have the money to buy a house but have been waiting to enter the market, the credit could encourage them to buy now rather than later. If home prices fall by another few percentage points, the tax break will help cushion the blow of falling home prices.

But what about the person who is on the edge of being able to afford to buy at all—the one who needs the money for the down payment? Assuming there will be ways of accessing the money quickly they face lower upfront costs but higher future expenses. Isn’t this a lot like the financing game that got us into the housing mess in the first place? It would be a shame if the government ends up effectively setting up the next generation of defaulting home-owners.

At least the current credit is an improvement over an earlier tax break proposed for people buying foreclosed property. Still, adding yet another credit to the hundreds of billions in tax breaks we already lavish on homeowners makes me wonder whether we should step back and rethink whether owning is truly the answer for everyone.

The Washington pols who are pushing housing legislation should meet my friends Steve and Laura. They are a 30-something couple with a two-year old daughter, and they have been waiting for years to buy a house.   more »

Why is it that the biggest problems always seem to encourage the worst possible solutions? The latest case in point: The Senate's housing bill, grandly titled "The Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008."   more »

What to make of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson's plan to rewrite regulation of the financial services industry?   more »

When a young Jack Nicklaus won the 1965 Master's, golf legend Bobby Jones said he "was playing a game with which I am not familiar." I have the same feeling about the financial markets today.    more »

Six months ago, states were predicting balanced budgets and surpluses. Virtually all had surpluses at the end of fiscal year 2007 and more than half had ending balances equaling at least 10 percent of their general funds. Governors and legislatures were happily talking about property tax relief and expanding medical coverage to the uninsured.   more »

Well, it could have been worse. President Bush and House leaders say they have cut a deal on a $150 billion stimulus package—about $100 billion for families and individuals and about $50 billion for businesses. The centerpiece of the plan: a cash payment of at least $300 for most wage earners, along with an additional $300 per child.    more »

The leaders of both the House and Senate are exploring options for an economic stimulus plan they would unveil if the economy continues to weaken in 2008, TaxVox has learned. The talks, still in their early stages, could trigger a major election-year battle over fiscal policy. While neither party has settled on a plan, congressional Republicans are likely to propose new tax breaks as well an extension of the 2001 Bush tax cuts. Democrats are looking at a mix of tax cuts and other measures that they'd attach to targeted relief for those hardest hit by the mortgage mess.    more »

In the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001, Congress created a program in which taxpayers would backstop private insurance in the event of another major terror attack. The program, called the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), was supposed to be a temporary effort to both stabilize the insurance industry and prevent a broader economic meltdown after insurers stopped writing property and casualty coverage for many urban commercial developments.    more »

"Creditors would be prohibited from … extending credit without considering borrowers' ability to repay the loan." This is not a joke. It is part of proposed new Federal Reserve Board regulations aimed at stopping banks from repeating the shockingly bad lending practices that led to the still-worsening mortgage mess. Perhaps they could call the new rule "stop me before I lend again."    more »