Did Multinationals Use a Foreign Earnings Tax Holiday To Burnish Their Financials Rather Than Reduce Taxes?

By :: June 11th, 2014

We've known for years that the 2004 repatriation tax holiday did little to boost domestic investment or create U.S. jobs, as promised by its backers. Now we are learning that many multinational corporations were not even interested in using the temporary holiday to cut their taxes. Instead, according to a new study, it may have been little more than an easy way for them to manipulate earnings to polish their financial statements.

Yet Congress remains seduced by the idea. After all, it looks free money--a plan that raises revenue but can be promoted as a tax cut. That’s why a decade ago lawmakers enacted a temporary tax break for multinational firms that brought their foreign earnings back to the U.S. And that’s why pols as diverse as Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) are pushing for a new version of a repatriation holiday today.

It was a terrible idea back in 2004. It is still a terrible idea—and two very different analyses help explain why.

The first, by the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, estimates that while cutting taxes for one year on repatriated earnings briefly generates new revenue, it significantly increases the deficit even within Congress’ usual 10-year budget window.

According to a new JCT estimate, such a holiday would boost federal revenues by about $19 billion over the first two years as firms pay some tax on funds they would otherwise have kept overseas tax-free. But since multinationals are getting a tax break for bringing money back they would eventually have returned anyway (at higher rates), JCT figures the tax holiday would add almost $96 billion to the deficit over a decade. So much for free money.

The second study, by financial accounting experts Michaele Morrow of Northeastern University and Robert C. Ricketts of Texas Tech, looks closely at how firms responded to the 2004 tax break. Their fascinating conclusion: For many multinationals, the benefit of the holiday was not primarily tax savings at all. Rather, it provided an easy way to manage the earnings they report to shareholders by manipulating their financial statements.

To put it a bit more crudely: Congress let multinationals pay deeply discounted taxes on $350 billion in repatriated earnings largely to make them look good to Wall Street analysts.

The study, published in The Journal of the American Taxation Association, found that while some multinationals used the tax holiday to boost reported earnings, others took advantage of the tax break to reduce book income, all in an attempt to exactly match analysts’ expectations. Either way, many firms were not interested in maximizing real shareholder wealth by reducing taxes. Rather, they brought back only the amount necessary to hit financial reporting targets.

Morrow and Ricketts were answering a perplexing question: If about $800 billion in foreign earnings was available for repatriation at low tax rates, why did firms bring back only $350 billion?

To find out, they surveyed 596 multinationals that reported pre-tax foreign earnings and found less than 60 percent brought any money back at all, and overall they repatriated only about 44 percent of the amount they could have returned.

Why would a firm pass up a chance to bring money back to the U.S. at a steeply-discounted tax rate?

The authors conclude there were two major reasons. The first, and most obvious, is that multinationals had better investment opportunities overseas, even after factoring in the very low tax on repatriated profits. For those firms, the tax holiday had no effect on either their investment decisions or their tax liability.

The second answer is less apparent to those of us who are not accounting geeks. In the words of Morrow and Ricketts, “firms may have viewed the tax holiday primarily as an opportunity to manage reported…earnings rather than an opportunity to save taxes.”

The good news, I suppose, is that since firms may not have been interested in maximizing tax savings, the revenue loss was not as bad as it might have been. But backers insisted the 2004 tax holiday would boost domestic investment and create new U.S. jobs. Extensive other research has found little or no evidence that either happened.

Add it all up and the 2004 law appears to have gone far off the tracks. Firms didn’t increase domestic investment. They didn’t hire more U.S. workers. Now we learn they didn’t even maximize their tax savings. Instead, in many cases, the tax holiday was mostly an opportunity to burnish their financial statements.

As Congress considers whether to declare another holiday, it should ask itself whether that’s the best use of tax revenue.




  1. Michael Bindner  ::  2:01 am on June 12th, 2014:

    Anyone who knows business strategy knows that demand contributes more to expansion or modernization than available revenue from tax cuts or low interest rates. Any investment manager who tries to act otherwise in a Fortune 500 firm would be fired. (and I helped write the book on this).

    It is no surprise that the tax holiday in 2004 did not make money. At the time tax rates on dividends and capital gains were at modern lows. While they are 40% higher this year, so that monies paid to investors will be taxed if distributed, a new tax holiday should include even higher rates the year of the repatriation and even higher ones the next year (to incentivize cashing in).

    As to the accounting study, the other show has not yet dropped. Here it is. Companies make their financials look good for one reason and one reason only – and it is not investor confidece. It is to eventually raise the stock price so that CEOs can give themselves a bonus (as opposed to the bonus they give themselves in down times for cutting costs). I’m sure a few CEOs are boosting tax reform and a repartriation holday for their own personal gain. Some may even give TPC/Brookings/Urban a check (while others fund Cato & Co.). Luckily this won’t get done this year – and certainly not with the increased dividend and gains taxes to make it worthwhile for the Treasury.

  2. Greg Jenner  ::  1:00 pm on June 12th, 2014:

    As Acting Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy during 2004, I did everything I possibly could to convince anyone who would listen that repatriation was a horrible idea. We at Treasury predicted what would happen: no increase in jobs and a lot of dividends and stock repurchases. However, most everyone on the Hill had stars in their eyes and the ridiculous arguments they were being given convinced them it was found money. What is inconceivable to me is that they are seriously thinking of doing it again, especially in light of the OVERWHELMING evidence that repatriation would have little, if any, benefit.

  3. 2014 TAXES DELAYED  ::  4:17 pm on June 12th, 2014:

    […] TaxVox » Blog Archive Repatriation tax holiday is a bad idea […]

  4. TAXES RATES 2014  ::  7:18 pm on June 12th, 2014:

    […] TaxVox » Blog Archive Repatriation tax holiday is a bad idea […]

  5. Kyla Briganti  ::  6:41 am on June 15th, 2014:

    Whilst possibly a little off the usual topic, I hope this is of some benefit. Taking a rail trip, is a fantastic way to get more informative, relaxing or exciting times into your travel plans. Train trips can be vast in scale, across huge nations or just a more regionally focused travel experience. A little research, to source discount train tickets, can add great financial value to your journey plans. Avoid the crowds, endless stress and hassle of airports and busy roads, get aboard a train for some great leisure time adventure and relaxation.

  6. larry bell  ::  12:10 am on August 10th, 2014:

    Thanks, I really appreciated, being able to consider, what you had to say here and, I’m keen to see what other folks wish to contribute. Good information to read here – thanks! Thanks, I’m considering what you have say here and am glad to comment!

  7. google api tutorial  ::  3:02 am on September 20th, 2014:

    You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter
    to be really something which I think I would never understand.

    It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I am looking
    forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  8. healthy diet  ::  11:29 pm on October 20th, 2014:

    healthy diet

    Repatriation tax holiday is a bad idea

  9. Shred Junky  ::  10:18 am on October 29th, 2014:

    Interestingly, when you’re comfortable with performing these
    chords, you can already enjoy a couple of very good songs that you
    will definitely appreciate. Keeping your strings clean by boiling
    them or giving them a good wipe down with rubbing alcohol will prolong the life a bit more.
    As you will find out in this article (and video),
    the key to playing killer guitar phrases is focusing
    on “how” you play” not necessarily which notes you use.

  10. elimination of wrinkles  ::  6:12 pm on November 5th, 2014:

    Hi mates, good post and good urging commented at this place, I am
    really enjoying by these.