Why Not Ditch the Medical Device Excise Tax and Boost Cigarette Taxes?

By :: May 23rd, 2014

TPC_LogoSenate Republicans are insisting that the 2.3% excise tax on medical devices, enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act, be repealed as part of the package extending expired tax provisions. Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says the proposal to chip away at part of Obamacare is not germane and has refused to allow a vote on the amendment. The stand-off has put the extenders bill in limbo.

It’s easy to lampoon Republicans for voting, yet again, to repeal at least part of Obamacare—the House has voted for full or partial repeal more than 50 times—but they have a point. The medical device tax is dubious policy. And an obvious tax offset exists. Higher cigarette taxes would raise revenue and lower the costs of the Affordable Care Act over time by reducing tobacco-related illnesses.

The medical device excise tax was part of a suite of taxes designed to offset some of the costs of the Affordable Care Act. The rationale was that the health sector would benefit from the higher demand for medical services and the taxes would recapture part of the resulting windfall. There are also taxes on insurers and drug manufacturers.

The tax is small and it exempts exports and direct sales to consumers (e.g., eyeglasses). Jane Gravelle and Sean Lowry of the Congressional Research Service concluded that the tax would mostly be passed on to consumers, having negligible effects on profits. The warnings of a massive exodus of US manufacturers in response to the tax are thus overblown.

But taxes on intermediate production activities are economically inefficient. Compared with broad-based taxes on spending or income, they produce large distortions relative to the revenue collected. And CRS warns that since the tax is relatively small, administration and compliance costs are likely to be large relative to revenues—especially for small manufacturers.

Cigarette excise taxes present a much better targeted alternative. Cigarette taxes discourage youth smoking and ultimately reduce lifetime health expenditures. Given that federal health programs, such as the ACA, ultimately foot the bill for many of these costs, the cigarette excise tax could be viewed as a kind of benefits tax—paying for health insurance that is more valuable to smokers than the rest of us.

The common critique of cigarette taxes is that they are regressive—poor people are more apt to smoke than others. But they would also benefit to the extent that they—or their children—are dissuaded from smoking (assuming that smoking is a choice that they would ultimately regret). And part of the revenue from cigarette taxes could be recycled into programs that help the poor such as the EITC.

The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that raising the cigarette excise tax by 50 cents from $1.01 to $1.51 would bring in about $37 billion over the ten-year budget window, more than offsetting the $29 billion in revenues lost if the medical device tax is eliminated. The surplus could be plowed into a higher EITC (or offsetting more of the costs of the extenders) or the cigarette tax could be increased less.

Democrats fear that repealing the device tax would fuel efforts to roll back other ACA taxes, and that’s possible. But establishing the precedent that such changes must be offset would significantly raise the bar for future policy changes.

Follow me on twitter

7Comments

  1. Friday News Roundup! | The Civil Word  ::  12:51 pm on May 23rd, 2014:

    […] TaxVox: Why Not Ditch the Medical Device Excise Tax and Boost Cigarette Taxes? […]

  2. Michael Bindner  ::  4:01 am on May 24th, 2014:

    As an ex-smoker, I have to say that the taxes made little difference, so a higher tax seems to simply be messing with addicts who can’t say no until they feel the health effects (and maybe not even then). I am astounded at how high a pack of cigarettes is – and that is dependent on each state. Some states have very high cigarette taxes, so high that it encourages smuggling. It does not really encourage non-smoking so any higher tax can be seen as extortion.

    As for the device manufacturers tax, I am not sure that it sets a good precident to allow them to repudiate a deal they already made. Unless the windfall expected in the ACA does not come through, repeal is not an option – unless of course it is done as part of a more radical converstion to Value Added Taxes or a Net Business Receipts Tax. Then every manufacturer would pay such taxes. Of course, the GOP seems allergic to a VAT, although for some strange reason they support the FairTax – which is like a VAT, but only paid by consumers, while it encourages cheating (claiming a purchase was for a business, not personal use). Why the GOP is all friendly with the idea of increasing tax evasion is beyond me.

  3. Vivian Darkbloom  ::  3:13 am on May 25th, 2014:

    “It does not really encourage non-smoking so any higher tax can be seen as extortion.”

    “As for the device manufacturers tax, I am not sure that it sets a good precident to allow them to repudiate a deal they already made.”

    Let me see if I understand this: a higher tax on cigarettes would constitute “extortion”, but the threat of higher taxes on medical devices that induced an “agreement” to somewhat less higher taxes, is presumably not “extortion” and therefore it would therefore constitute bad policy to repeal the latter.

    To avoid the “extortion problem” I suggest that Congress propose an additional cigarette tax on tobacco of, say, $2 per pack and then agree with tobacco manufacturers that it should be $1. It would then set a very bad precedent to go back on that “agreement”.

    And, of course, medical devices harm the health of our citizenry; tobacco doesn’t.

  4. MARYLAND ESTIMATED TAXES 2014  ::  11:22 am on May 27th, 2014:

    […] Why Not Ditch the Medical Device Excise Tax and Boost … – TaxVox […]

  5. Bill Ralston says Labour's Tax Policy is like genital herpes … | Herpes Survival Kit  ::  6:01 am on May 28th, 2014:

    […] page » Butterflies and WheelsTaxes Do Matter to MigrationTaxConnections Worldwide Tax BlogTaxVox var imwbvp_ajaxurl = 'http://www.herpessurvivalkit.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php'; // ]]> […]

  6. The Best And Safest Alternative to Cigarette Smoking – ELiquid  ::  3:33 am on September 28th, 2014:

    […] smoking of the e cig is very much hygienic and beneficial from all respects. The electronic cigarette device is filled with very special and good smell juices called the e-juices. These juices are very […]

  7. click through the following article  ::  6:42 am on October 21st, 2014:

    click through the following article

    TaxVox