Are Multinationals Getting Tired of Waiting for Corporate Tax Reform?

By :: May 15th, 2014

Is it possible that U.S.-based multinationals are getting tired of waiting for Congress to enact corporate tax reform? Seeking cash for domestic acquisitions, some of the nation’s best-known firms are starting to bring back their foreign earnings. Some are finding ways to avoid paying tax at all on that income. Others are so anxious to put the money to work in the U.S. that they are paying stiff taxes to do so.

The no-tax method is being practiced by U.S. based multinationals that move their headquarters to eliminate U.S. taxes on foreign profits. The current poster child for this tactic, known as an inversion, is drugmaker Pfizer. The firm is aggressively bidding to acquire the British firm AstraZeneca, a purchase that would make it possible for the merged company to establish its headquarters in the U.K. and thus avoid the 35 percent U.S. tax when it returns overseas revenues to the U.S.

Pfizer isn’t alone. Published reports identify Eaton Corp. and Chiquita Brands International as two other firms seeking to restructure themselves to avoid paying U.S. tax on repatriated earnings.

Other multinationals are paying hefty taxes to tap their foreign profits. For instance, in April eBay announced it would shift $9 billion in overseas earnings back to the U.S., even though it would have to pay $3 billion in taxes to do so. Others expected to repatriate foreign profits, even if they must pay tax, include Google, Oracle, and Merck--all reportedly seeking to finance acquisitions.

In the short run, at least, many lawmakers—and the Treasury—are happy to see eBay and others pay taxes on overseas income. By contrast, the Pfizer bid—which has so far been spurned—has predictably troubled Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans. Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to curb inversions. The Obama Administration included similar restrictions in its recent budget. And Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) promises his own bill this week.

But what does all this say about tax reform? For years, critics have argued that by taxing foreign income at high rates while allowing firms to defer taxes until they bring that money home, the U.S. tax system has locked up funds and discouraged domestic investment.

A tax rewrite would make deals like Pfizer’s less attractive in two ways. First, it would lower U.S. corporate rates. Second, it is widely expected that reform would couple a new tax regime with special transition provisions to allow firms to bring foreign earnings back to the U.S. with a big tax discount.

House Ways & Means Committee Chair Dave Camp’s reform bill and the rewrite proposed by former Finance panel chair Max Baucus both include a repatriation tax holiday. The idea is popular with lawmakers because congressional scorekeepers would count it as a tax increase, generating extra revenue to finance cuts in tax rates.

Trouble is, given ongoing political gridlock in Washington, tax reform is likely to happen later rather than sooner.

Some multinationals can afford to wait. They are awash in cash and seem to have little interest in doing much with it other than buying back their own stock. Plus, with interest rates so low, it is cheaper for them to borrow the money than repatriate foreign earnings at a 35 percent tax rate.

Other firms, however, need cash now. And they can’t keep their corporate profits locked up while Congress fiddles.

If repatriation and inversions really start to catch on, they could change the political dynamic for tax reform. The more firms repatriate foreign income, the less interested the business community will be in a corporate tax holiday and, perhaps, even broad reform. And, not incidentally, the less tax revenue a holiday would produce to finance rate cuts. These trends could further divide an already-split business community and end up making corporate reform even tougher than it is now.



  1. Michael Bindner  ::  4:37 am on May 16th, 2014:

    Banning inversion and P.O. Box Headquarters are good reforms to advance, although getting everyone to agree seems like a troublesome proposition. Of course, if the investors want their money, especially the big shareholders and the CEOs, the tax treatment will seem less important – especially if some kind of Buffett rule may pass. It could be that investors just gave up on lower taxes again on capital gains and dividends. If they see another GOP presidency has hopeless, they may just bring the money home as soon as possible, fearful that Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden or Martin O’Malley might win and raise individual taxes even more.

  2. top ten review  ::  12:19 pm on May 16th, 2014:

    Hi, merely start seeing your current blog page by using Bing, and discovered that it’s absolutely helpful. Let me beware of the town. We’re grateful just in case you progress that in future. Many people could be reaped the benefit from a publishing. Many thanks!

  3. A Block, a Bridge, a Treat, a Bill, and a Correction  ::  2:01 am on May 18th, 2014:

    […] see broader reform to solve the “root problem” of poorly designed corporate taxes. TPC’s Howard Gleckman wonders whether multinational corporations are tired of […]

  4. Matt Lykken  ::  10:26 am on May 18th, 2014:

    This is again why we need to enact the Shared Economic Growth proposal,

  5. laboratoriobicilindrico  ::  9:16 pm on May 23rd, 2014:

    Whether you are a senior citizen or younger, the advantages of very good insurance coverage lengthen to everyone in most avenues . Traditional products contain ammonia as well as other toxic chemicals which badly modify the health with the workers because they are . Because infrared is energyefficient, your pockets can breathe freely as your utility bill is cut dramatically.. The Indian Premier League (IPL) betting syndicate has got the capital’s schoolchildren in its sights now. Children from D

  6. cheap Packers jerseys from china  ::  10:09 pm on June 9th, 2014:

    VIP cheap Hornets authentic jerseys

  7.  ::  2:58 am on June 28th, 2014:

    スピリチュアリスト  宇宙と宇宙人に比べたらアメリカ・ロシア・中国・インド・コーカソイド・中国人は大したことはない。  そこまで固執しなくてもいいのにと思うな

  8. The Great Tax Inversion Death Spiral | Social Dashboard  ::  5:21 pm on July 17th, 2014:

    […] reformers. As more companies abandon the U.S. tax system by converting themselves into foreign-headquartered firms, business support for reform could […]

  9. Die große Steuer-Umstellungs-Todesspirale – Nachrichten Heute Deutschland  ::  5:28 pm on July 17th, 2014:

    […] Da mehr Firmen das US-Steuersystem verlassen, indem sie in fremd-Hauptsitz gehabte Unternehmen sich umwandeln, könnte Geschäftsunterstützung […]

  10. The winners – and losers – in race to ban inversions | News Today  ::  3:41 pm on July 20th, 2014:

    […] reformers. As some-more companies abandon a US taxation system by converting themselves into foreign-headquartered firms, business support for remodel could […]

  11. The winners – and losers – in race to ban inversions – News  ::  6:17 am on July 21st, 2014:

    […] reformers. As more companies abandon the US tax system by converting themselves into foreign-headquartered firms, business support for reform could […]

  12. instagram followers  ::  6:01 pm on July 22nd, 2014:

    instagram followers

    TaxVox » Blog Archive Are Multinationals Getting Tired of Waiting for Corporate Tax Reform? » TaxVox