How Does Dave Camp Pay for Individual Tax Cuts? By Raising Revenue from Corporations

By :: February 27th, 2014

Key elements of the tax code rewrite proposed yesterday by House Ways & Means Committee Chair Dave Camp (R-MI) came straight from the playbook of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. The most surprising: As in 1986, it would pay for individual tax cuts by boosting taxes on corporations—at least temporarily.

Hard to believe, perhaps, but true. Camp would cut individual income taxes by nearly $590 billion over the ten-year budget window. And he’d raise business tax revenue by about $520 billion over the same period, not counting the bank tax and other changes in excise taxes.

But therein lies the rub: Much of the new business tax revenue is temporary and will disappear after a decade. What’s going on here?

Remember, the House GOP leadership required Camp to reduce the corporate tax rate to 25 percent from the current 35 percent. He did it, but phased the rate reduction in over five years. He’d also repeal the corporate alternative minimum tax, and make permanent two tax cuts that are traditionally included in a package known as “tax extenders” (increased small business expensing and the R&E credit). In total, these changes would reduce corporate revenues by nearly $880 billion through 2024.

The plan would pay for those revenue losses by repealing or modifying a large number of business tax rules. It would scrap dozens of highly targeted, industry-specific credits, repeal a special deduction for domestic manufacturing, and eliminate generous accounting rules for inventories. But two changes bring in the most revenue:

Eliminating accelerated depreciation ($270 billion). The proposal would repeal the current tax law’s favorable depreciation system (the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System, or MACRS) which generally allows firms to depreciate capital assets faster and over shorter time periods. Instead, most investment would be written-off more slowly, but indexed for inflation.

Amortizing R&D and advertising expenses ($360 billion). Instead of expensing these costs in the year they are incurred, firms would have to capitalize them over several years. Research expenses would be deducted over five years. Firms could deduct half of their advertising expenses right away, and write-off the rest over 10 years.

The other big revenue raiser comes from Camp’s restructuring of the taxation of U.S.-based multinationals. His move toward a “territorial” tax system (“participation exemption system with base erosion protections” for tax nerds) would be more than offset by a one-time tax on foreign earnings that are parked overseas, payable over 8 years. This transition tax would generate $170 billion within the ten-year budget window, but little revenue beyond 2024.

Camp would make few big changes to the structure of “pass-through” businesses—those firms taxed on individual rather than corporate returns—even though he included many in one of his earlier discussion drafts. Owners of businesses organized as sole proprietorships, limited liability companies (LLCs) or other partnerships, and S Corporations would continue to pay individual income taxes at ordinary rates as high as 35 percent (including the 10 percent surtax). However, income attributable to domestic manufacturing would be exempt from the surtax.

Add it all up and the Camp proposal would raise more revenue from businesses in the ten-year window than under current law. But does he really raise their tax burdens?

Probably not. The largest revenue raisers in the budget window are provisions that affect the timing—rather than the level—of deductions, and the temporary transition tax on deferred foreign profits. The timing changes raise more revenue during the transition than in the long-run (when higher deductions from past investments partially offset lower deductions for current investments) and revenue from the transition tax will rapidly disappear beyond 2024. Combined with the phased-in corporate rate cut and other international tax changes, this suggests that, on balance, businesses will be winners from this proposal.


  1. Michael Bindner  ::  1:41 am on February 28th, 2014:

    This seems like a shell game to some extent, especially in the long term. A twenty year window might stop such things. Tax cuts should end with equal rates for equal businesses – so having a corporate rate of 25% in the long run with a 35% rate on pass-throughs is not sustainable in the long term and encourages more work arounds. Of course, there is an army of tax lobbyists who will fight many of these changes and they all make contributions. I hope this is not some cynical ploy to shake them down for the 2014 election cycle. If not, Camp’s opponent will surely shake down a few of them instead – unless he quickly wins.

  2. Tyler Evilsizer  ::  9:36 am on February 28th, 2014:

    The proposal isn’t quite as much of a revenue shift from corporations to individuals as it looks like from JCT’s estimate. One of the major reasons is because passthroughs are counted in different places. All of the revenue lost from cutting rates on passthroughs is counted under individuals, deflating that score. Yet the revenue gained from reducing passthrough tax preferences falls in the corporate section.

    CRFB published its first take of the bill yesterday.

  3. Dave Camp vs The Tax Code, Ctd | Konfeksiyon Tekstil  ::  2:52 pm on February 28th, 2014:

    […] crunching the numbers, Joseph Rosenberg concludes that businesses would see their overall tax burden […]

  4. Michael Bindner  ::  4:45 am on March 1st, 2014:

    The problem is, there are still different rates.

  5.  ::  2:20 pm on July 2nd, 2014:

    what means xoxo

  6. Omnipress overlay  ::  1:34 am on August 24th, 2014:

    Great site you have here.. It’s hard to find quality writing like yours nowadays.
    I honestly appreciate individuals like you! Take care!!

  7. slot  ::  11:37 am on September 11th, 2014:

    Asking questions are genuinely pleasant
    thing if you are not understanding something completely, except this article gives pleasant understanding

  8. San Francisco limo deals  ::  10:58 pm on September 20th, 2014:

    For instance, the main characters are both trying very hard to
    get into an Ivy League school, and almost fail to do so, but they both
    succeed in the end. Business phone systems provide a channel for communication to companies with customers, partners, employees and vendors.
    Since the malls are failing, the stores in them are, too.

  9. cheap price homewerks worldwide  ::  7:07 am on September 21st, 2014:

    cheap price homewerks worldwide


  10. custom fitted hats  ::  8:14 pm on September 22nd, 2014:

    An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a co-worker who
    was conducting a little research on this. And he
    actually bought me lunch due to the fact that I found it for him…
    lol. So let me reword this…. Thanks for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanks for spending some time to discuss this issue here on your blog.

  11. sboasia  ::  9:11 pm on September 26th, 2014:

    Thanks on your marvelous posting! I seriously enjoyed reading it,
    you are a great author. I will remember to bookmark your blog and may come
    back later on. I want to encourage that you continue your great work, have a
    nice afternoon!

  12. forge of empires cheats  ::  3:38 pm on September 28th, 2014:

    However it sounds speculative, Dennett seems to have gotten it right then. In the words of Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias, “If I am a creation of
    God, then life must be deemed sacred. Walter Truett Anderson, a major proponent
    of postmodern politics, has also done the same with his The
    Next Enlightenment, where he alludes to Richard Dawkin’s neo-Darwinism.

  13. herpes simplex 1 transmission  ::  12:01 am on September 29th, 2014:

    HSV-1 infections may also spread to the eye (herpes keratitis), face and upper body (herpes gladiatorum),
    in rare circumstances, forms of brain swelling that can bring about death.

  14. servicios tecnicos culturales  ::  4:31 am on October 22nd, 2014:

    No matter if some one searches for his required thing,
    therefore he/she wishes to be available that in detail, therefore
    that thing is maintained over here.