The US Income Tax Burden, County by County

By :: December 16th, 2013

Differences in income and other characteristics mean that federal income tax  burdens vary substantially across counties. While the median federal income tax burden across counties is about $3,400, approximately 10 percent of counties  have average tax burdens less than $2,100 and around 10 percent of counties have  average tax burdens over $6,700. Counties with high federal income tax burdens  are concentrated around large cities, the California coast, southern Florida,  and the corridor between Washington DC and Boston.

Income taxes comprise a substantial fraction of the country's revenue stream. In recent years, around 45 percent of federal revenue was derived from income taxes, with federal income tax revenue amounting to about 7 percent of GDP. Income tax burdens vary for a host of reasons, including family demographic characteristics, level and composition of income, and deductions and tax benefits claimed. Since these characteristics vary by geographic location, it is natural to see variation in income tax burdens across localities.

The map below presents variation in income tax burdens for each county in the United States. (Data are from 2007, the most recent data available for this type of analysis.) The variation—due in large part due to differences in incomes—is stark. In absolute dollars, the average tax burden across counties is $3,419, but some counties' average tax burden is substantially more and some counties' burden is substantially less. Ten percent of counties have average tax bills of $2,102 or less, while ten percent of counties had average tax bills of $6,745 or more. As a share of adjusted gross income, the lowest 10 percent of counties had average tax bills under 7.4 percent of income while the top 10 percent of counties had average tax bills in excess of 11.7 percent of income.   (See here for an interactive map that also presents county-level tax burdens as a share of income.)

In general, counties with higher income tax burdens—due in large part to higher incomes—tend to be clustered around large cities. For example, most counties in Illinois have low average federal income tax burdens, with the exception of those counties surrounding Chicago. In addition, Texas counties close to Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio generally have higher tax federal income tax burdens relative to those counties farther from a major city. Counties located on the California coast, in southern Florida, and within the corridor between Washington DC and Boston also tend to have higher federal income tax burdens. In addition, some counties that host popular ski resorts—such as Pitkin County, CO (which contains the city of Aspen) and Teton County, WY (which contains Jackson Hole)—also have notably high income tax burdens.

Several caveats to the data are worth noting. One, the data only include those families who filed income tax returns. Thus, families who did not file returns are not counted in the average tax burdens. Two, in 2007 many low- and middle-income families could receive a stimulus-based rebate, but only if they filed an income tax form. This induced some families who would not have filled income taxes to submit a tax return in order to receive the rebate. Lastly, to protect the confidentiality of taxpayers, the Statistics of Income division at the Internal Revenue Service has omitted information from some counties; data on these counties is not publicly available.County Map

17Comments

  1. Michael Bindner  ::  1:05 am on December 17th, 2013:

    The omitted data is probably for the richest taxpayers (like Warren Buffett). Non-urban and non-suburban counties are likely low due to the depopulation of rural America. We are no longer a nation of farmers – so the skew favoring urban and suburban areas is a natural consequence.

  2. Tax Roundup, 12/17/2013: Map day! « Roth & Company, P.C  ::  9:34 am on December 17th, 2013:

    […] Harris, The US Income Tax Burden, County by County […]

  3. This Map Shows Which Parts Of The Country Pay The Highest Federal Income Taxes | Allmin.ed  ::  11:21 am on December 17th, 2013:

    […] freshly published map from the Tax Policy Center uses 2007 data to show average Federal income taxes in various countries around the world. The […]

  4. Maryann  ::  11:35 am on December 17th, 2013:

    The legend shows the gradient from $1,000 to $70,000; but the article refers to numbers in the $1,000 to $7,000 range. Is this a typo? or are some counties really that far out of the normal range?

  5. Secondary Sources: Types of Jobs, Government Spending, Tax Burden – Real Time Economics – WSJ  ::  9:10 pm on December 17th, 2013:

    […] –Tax Burden: Ben Harris looks at the county by county income tax burden. “Differences in income and other characteristics mean that federal income tax burdens vary substantially across counties. While the median federal income tax burden across counties is about $3,400, approximately 10 percent of counties have average tax burdens less than $2,100 and around 10 percent of counties have average tax burdens over $6,700. Counties with high federal income tax burdens are concentrated around large cities, the California coast, southern Florida, and the corridor between Washington DC and Boston.” […]

  6. 2014 VIRGINIA TAX FORM  ::  12:29 am on December 18th, 2013:

    […] TaxVox » Blog Archive » The US Income Tax Burden, County by … […]

  7. Ben Harris  ::  12:54 pm on December 18th, 2013:

    Good question. Almost all counties—about 95 percent—have average federal income tax bills under $9,000, but a few very rich counties have average tax bills that exceed $40,000. Thus, the scale needed to include very high average federal income tax bills to account for these few select counties.

  8. Income tax burden by county | BBI  ::  11:21 am on January 8th, 2014:

    […] Just because it’s interesting to look…Original piece on TPC here. […]

  9. Commercial Electiricty  ::  3:11 pm on May 7th, 2014:

    fantastic post, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite
    specialists of this sector do not notice this. You should proceed your writing.
    I am confident, you’ve a great readers’ base already!

  10. Flinchtech.zendesk.com  ::  2:59 am on June 28th, 2014:

    両目あいてないとコンタクトはいってもずれるからな
    満州族が建てた清朝や、日本に協力した満州国に統治された歴史が原因で、東北地方では満州語を操る人が数十人まで激減した。 地球イチバン 世界一UFOに近い街~アルゼンチン・カピージャデルモンテ~
    コンタクトレンズな洗浄機買ってみた。

  11. kosmetyki revlon  ::  5:55 am on July 12th, 2014:

    kosmetyki revlon

    TaxVox » Blog Archive The US Income Tax Burden, County by County » TaxVox

  12. coolsville.co.uk  ::  11:16 am on August 6th, 2014:

    Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was curious
    about your situation; many of us have developed some nice methods and we
    are looking to trade strategies with others, why not shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  13. projektowanie wnętrz  ::  12:54 pm on September 22nd, 2014:

    Hey there! I know this is kind of off topic but I was
    wondering if you knew where I could locate a
    captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one?
    Thanks a lot!

  14. sklep z kosmetykami  ::  5:01 am on September 23rd, 2014:

    Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to your blog before but
    after looking at a few of the articles I realized it’s
    new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely pleased I came across it and I’ll be
    book-marking it and checking back often!

  15. listwy zębatec  ::  10:58 am on October 1st, 2014:

    Your style is unique in comparison to other people I’ve read stuff from.
    Thanks for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess
    I’ll just bookmark this site.

  16. privater hausfrauensex  ::  8:31 am on October 8th, 2014:

    I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but yiur sites really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later.
    All the best

  17. reddelacosta.com.ar  ::  5:21 pm on January 4th, 2015:

    reddelacosta.com.ar

    TaxVox