Automatic Retirement Saving Inches Forward

By :: March 22nd, 2013

Automatic enrollment is slowly gaining steam as the choice strategy to encourage retirement saving.  A bold plan in California would eventually make the practice widespread and could revolutionize the state’s saving landscape.

Last September, the California legislature approved a framework for automatically enrolling private-sector workers in a retirement savings plan.  Employers with more than five workers would have to offer a workplace retirement plan, automatically enroll employees in the newly established California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Plan (SCP), or face a fine. Workers enrolled in SCP would automatically contribute 3 percent of their pay to an IRA-like account unless they opted out; like an IRA, benefits would be based on account contributions and investment returns. Employers are only required to set up the plan, not to contribute to the account, and there is no explicit cost to taxpayers.

A third-party—either a private firm or California’s pension administrator (CALPERS)—would administer the plan, investing no more than half the pooled funds in equities. (A private administrator may be the superior option given CALPERS’ recent history of fraud and mismanagement.) Annual administrative expenses would be limited to one percent of fund assets. The framework also calls for a guaranteed return, although the details have yet to be ironed out.

The plan is a long way from becoming a reality. The framework calls for further study of the plan’s feasibility and costs, and additional legislation will be needed to turn the idea into policy. In addition, the IRS and Department of Labor must still rule on the legality of some of the details.

Nonetheless, California’s plan shows exceptional promise. By utilizing automatic enrollment, which has been proven to bolster enrollment in private 401(k) plans, the plan could bring more than 6 million workers into the retirement saving universe. It takes advantage of a pooled investment strategy to lower administrative costs and ensure a balanced investment portfolio. The benefits would be progressively distributed. Workers take the accounts with them if they switch jobs. The plan is entirely self-funded with no extra cost to taxpayers. And it’s entirely voluntary; workers who do not want to contribute may opt out.

But there’s one big drawback: the guaranteed return purchased from private firms. Guaranteed returns would be great if they were free, but they’re not. Workers would have to pay private firms to guarantee the investment return, which would increase investment fees, possibly a lot. The structure of the guarantee dictates the price. Guarantees that exclusively protect against steep losses or those that “collar” the return (i.e., impose a minimum and maximum return) are less expensive. Guarantees that ensure at least a modest return are pricey. One analysis put the cost of a guaranteed 2 percent real rate of return at 29 percent of contributions.

An important new study reinforces the benefits of automatic enrollment. In a sample of Danish workers, researchers at Harvard and the University of Copenhagen found that approximately 85 percent of retirement savers are “passive” savers. Passive savers don’t respond to price subsidies like tax benefits, but will save more if automatically enrolled in a savings account. Importantly, the researchers found that under a system without automatic enrollment, 98 percent of contributions to existing retirement accounts were simply offsets to other types of saving—a finding that casts doubt on the billions of dollars in tax expenditures now devoted to encouraging retirement saving.

California’s plan faces several hurdles before enactment. But the evidence suggests that if it ever becomes policy, the plan will go a long towards increasing retirement saving.

17Comments

  1. Tax Roundup, 3/22/2013: IRS makes it easy for many taxpayers to pay late. And Beavers at the end of the pond. « Roth & Company, P.C  ::  9:16 am on March 22nd, 2013:

    […] Ben Harris,  Automatic Retirement Saving Inches Forward (TaxVox) […]

  2. J.D.  ::  10:53 am on March 22nd, 2013:

    CA is learning well from the recent episode in Cyprus. If they make people save money, they’ll have nice, fat, sitting-duck piles of cash ripe for confiscation.

  3. Secondary Sources: Cyprus, More Bernanke, Retirement Saving – Retirement Calculators Free  ::  11:30 am on March 22nd, 2013:

    […] –Retirement Saving: Ben Harris looks at measures meant to promote automatic retirement saving. “An important new study reinforces the benefits of automatic enrollment. In a sample of Danish workers, researchers at Harvard and the University of Copenhagen found that approximately 85 percent of retirement savers are “passive” savers. Passive savers don’t respond to price subsidies like tax benefits, but will save more if automatically enrolled in a savings account. Importantly, the researchers found that under a system without automatic enrollment, 98 percent of contributions to existing retirement accounts were simply offsets to other types of saving—a finding that casts doubt on the billions of dollars in tax expenditures now devoted to encouraging retirement saving. California’s plan faces several hurdles before enactment. But the evidence suggests that if it ever becomes policy, the plan will go a long towards increasing retirement saving.” […]

  4. AMTbuff  ::  12:10 pm on March 22nd, 2013:

    Sooner or later legislators would succumb to the temptation to force these retirement plans to buy state bonds. For the workers’ own safety of course. Not just because the state is broke and nobody else wants to lend money to the state.

    In my opinion such a pension fund raid is more likely at the state level than at the federal level because there will be fewer people affected and less potential media attention.

  5. Concernicus  ::  4:00 pm on March 22nd, 2013:

    Completely bogus. Can AT&T force its workers to buy AT&T stock for their plan? Do you really think such a thing could happen in our nations largest state and no one would notice? Time for a new anti-gubmint tinfoil hat.

  6. Concernicus  ::  4:03 pm on March 22nd, 2013:

    Nope. It looks as if the “little people” with under 100,000 Euros in an INSURED account will be safe. The Russian oligarchs and other plutocrats who have been roundtripping and hiding money in the offshore accounts, often in a tax avoidance scheme, are about to get jammed up. Tough.

  7. Michael Bindner  ::  8:22 pm on March 22nd, 2013:

    A better plan would be automatic enrollment in a fund owning the voting stock of the employer, if the employer is corporate, with one third of those shares traded to an insurance fund holding similar company stock. Non-corporate employees would invest in the insurance fund itself. There would be very little administrative cost to this and it would provide revenue to companies to grow, with the protection of a fund that could, if 25% of shares objected to management decisions, examine and take over management of any member company.

  8. Secondary Sources: Cyprus, More Bernanke, Retirement Saving – Real Time Economics – WSJ  ::  9:25 pm on March 22nd, 2013:

    […] –Retirement Saving: Ben Harris looks at measures meant to promote automatic retirement saving. “An important new study reinforces the benefits of automatic enrollment. In a sample of Danish workers, researchers at Harvard and the University of Copenhagen found that approximately 85 percent of retirement savers are “passive” savers. Passive savers don’t respond to price subsidies like tax benefits, but will save more if automatically enrolled in a savings account. Importantly, the researchers found that under a system without automatic enrollment, 98 percent of contributions to existing retirement accounts were simply offsets to other types of saving—a finding that casts doubt on the billions of dollars in tax expenditures now devoted to encouraging retirement saving. California’s plan faces several hurdles before enactment. But the evidence suggests that if it ever becomes policy, the plan will go a long towards increasing retirement saving.” […]

  9. Financial Advisor  ::  3:50 pm on March 23rd, 2013:

    Yes the CA government will see a big pot of money that they can access. Our country took social security funds an exchange treasury IOUs for real money. Spain quietly drained their social security system. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323374504578217384062120520.html So yeah, the grabmit is not trustworthy

  10. S. Muriano  ::  3:25 pm on June 28th, 2013:

    Thank you another informative blog site. In which more might I am getting that type of info printed in this type of ideal method? I get a business that we are at the moment operating in, and I’ve recently been at the be aware of such facts.

  11. Weekend Reads | The Big Picture  ::  7:02 am on July 20th, 2013:

    […] economy needs a third term of Ben Bernanke (Quartz) • Automatic Retirement Saving Inches Forward (TaxVox) • Forecasting Denial: Why Are TV Weathercasters Ignoring Climate Change? (Rolling Stone) • […]

  12. Weekend Reads | The Big Picture  ::  8:04 am on August 23rd, 2013:

    […] economy needs a third term of Ben Bernanke (Quartz) • Automatic Retirement Saving Inches Forward (TaxVox) • Forecasting Denial: Why Are TV Weathercasters Ignoring Climate Change? (Rolling Stone) • […]

  13. overstock old navy coupon april 2013  ::  9:10 pm on October 17th, 2013:

    Learning to be thrifty in today’s economy will be a big help with your family grocery and clothing budget.
    Enjoy saving with home depot promo code plus free shipping.
    Consider store brands as your first choice for basic office
    supplies as many of these brands are just as good as the brand
    name products but cost a fraction as much.

  14. How to get people saving in America again? Obamacare for retirement accounts.  ::  3:56 pm on May 20th, 2014:

    […] In order to offer that guarantee, they have to buy insurance from a private firm, which could increase investment fees to about a third of the value of […]

  15. How to get people saving in America again? Obamacare for retirement accounts. | Report On Obamacare  ::  4:13 pm on May 20th, 2014:

    […] In order to offer that guarantee, they have to buy insurance from a private firm, which could increase investment fees to about a third of the value of […]

  16. Four ways to help low- and moderate-income families build wealth  ::  11:16 am on July 22nd, 2014:

    […] Make savings automatic. Having a safe place to deposit money and earn a decent return is the first step toward building savings. Access is crucial. Policies that expand access to retirement accounts at work and automatically enroll workers are a good place to start, and some efforts are already underway at the state level. […]

  17. mejor ebook  ::  3:13 am on August 12th, 2014:

    I almost never leave a response, however i did some searching
    and wound up here TaxVox