Sequester, We Hardly Knew Ye

By :: March 1st, 2013

I suspect that by early next week, the sequester will be old news. We’ll be on to the next crisis—the impending government shutdown scheduled for just a month from now. And there may be good reason for that—any deal to avoid the shutdown will almost surely replace the effects of the sequester, at least for the rest of this fiscal year.

Indeed, when Congress and President Obama decide over the next month how they are going to keep the government running through Sept. 30, lawmakers will have the opportunity to adjust the across-the-board spending cuts any way they want. In fact, much of the debate will be over just how much of the sequestered funds will be restored in that six month spending bill.

And that won’t be the end of it. Congress will then have exactly the same argument over the fiscal 2014 budget. Lawmakers are supposed to finish that fiscal blueprint by the end of September, though they almost certainly will not. The point is, the sequester is not written on stone tablets. Like every other budget gimmick Congress invents, this one can be rewritten, waived, and otherwise adjusted. And like every one before it, it probably will be.

The result is that many of the dreaded consequences of the sequester will never happen. Or, they’ll be overwhelmed by the effects of a government shutdown. Take, for example, federal employee furloughs. The sequester forces as many as one million workers to take limited time off  without pay—on average for about 14 days spread over the next seven months. But those furloughs can’t start until April 1.

If Congress can’t agree on a spending bill by the end of March, nearly all agencies will be shut down and all their employees laid off on April 1, making the sequester’s relatively modest furloughs irrelevant. On the other hand, if Congress and the president do agree on a budget for the rest of fiscal 2013, as they ultimately must, they are likely to make major changes to the sequester—adding money for some agencies, cutting for others, and very likely reducing the overall spending cuts entirely.  Thus, many of those furloughs will never take place.

How can this happen?  Simple. The across-the-board spending cuts continue through 2021. But only on paper.

The law creating the sequester (the Budget Control Act of 2011) lowers statutory caps on the spending authority of federal agencies. The money Congress gives each agency every year—appropriations—is technically not allowed to exceed those limits. Trouble is, Congress can waive the caps. And, in fact has  been doing so since at least the late 1980s--soon after it enacted a sequester under the Gramm Rudman Hollings budget law. No matter the language of the sequester, what Congress creates, it can just as easily destroy.

Because the sequester did lower the official budget baseline, restoring cuts will look like a spending increase and may prove awkward for some Republicans. But that is easily fixed—Congress will simply add back spending for 2013 while promising to cut more in future years.

The process is slightly different for mandatory spending, since Congress doesn’t appropriate money for those programs each year. But as part of any late March budget agreement, lawmakers can simply adjust the sequester’s  cuts to Medicare providers and other reductions in mandatory spending.

So the bottom line is this: For all the handwringing about the sequester, many of its effects are likely to be undone before they ever bite. I suspect this is no accident. Budget wonks knew exactly what would happen when Congress agreed to delay the sequester from January 1 to March 1 rather than March 28.

A month’s worth of sequester will be disruptive to business. And federal agencies will be spending weeks adjusting to cuts that may never happen instead of doing their real work. But it will give political cover to tea party Republicans, who can claim a fiscal trophy. And give Democrats the opportunity to blame the GOP for a potential parade of horribles, from airport delays to toxic meat.  But, soon enough, it will be just another footnote in Washington’s shameless tale of fiscal irresponsibility.


  1. AMTbuff  ::  5:01 pm on March 1st, 2013:

    Does this mean we have shifted from permanently temporary tax law to permenently temporary spending law?

    I guess the lesson is that until the parties compromise on the scope of government they will only approve one-year agreements at most. With the tax code now permanent, the out-year gap between the parties had to reappear immediately on the spending side of the budget.

  2. Michael Bindner  ::  8:52 pm on March 1st, 2013:

    This is why I believe budgets should be made regionally for discretionary military and civil spending (with product command spending allocated to using unit and deployed units paid nationally, along with strategic nuclear and sea operations). It should be funded by a receipt visible VAT, which after an amendment, would be regionally based. Entitlements would be funded with a similar tax, but would have offsets if employers pay for or provide services instead of the government. A small payroll tax would still exist so that there is some reward for working harder or more successfully. The remainder would be an income tax to fund net interest, grants to regions who cannot balance their budgets due to a fiscal emergency and strategic operations and overseas deployments, as well as paying down the Social Security Trust fund and any other principle we don’t want to carry – which will be necessary once the world evolves a currency not tied to the dollar.

  3. Michael Bindner  ::  8:55 pm on March 1st, 2013:

    Doing anything now, of course, is silly – because health insurance company stock may collapse later in the year or start to, leading to some kind of single payer or subsidized public option – again using some kind of consumption tax.

  4. sequestration, income and outlays, 4th quarter GDP revision, 4th quarter household debt, et al | r.j.'s space  ::  4:58 pm on March 3rd, 2013:

    […] and 750,000 jobs, which would increase the unemployment rate by 1/2 percent…of course, none of this is cast in stone and all of part of it could be reversed during any of the upcoming cri…which will be brought to you by a government determined to sabotage its own country; on March 27, […]

  5. Tax Roundup, 3/4/2013: Eight years for tax shelter lawyer. Plus: employee tax fraud, employer tax bill. « Roth & Company, P.C  ::  10:43 am on March 4th, 2013:

    […] Howard Gleckman,Sequester, We Hardly Knew Ye (TaxVox) […]

  6. Paul Duribreux  ::  7:16 am on May 13th, 2013:

    I happen to be commenting to make you be aware of what a magnificent discovery my friend’s princess enjoyed viewing your web page. She discovered numerous things, including how it is like to have a great giving heart to make other people completely fully grasp selected problematic things. You actually exceeded my expectations. Thank you for coming up with such warm and friendly, healthy, informative and fun guidance on the topic to Tanya.