What Mitt Romney Didn’t Learn from Ronald Reagan

By :: September 14th, 2012

If only Mitt Romney had paid attention to Ronald Reagan.

There are so many things the former Massachusetts governor could learn from the former California governor’s presidential campaigns. But I have in mind only one lesson not learned—how Reagan ran on tax reform in 1984.

Reagan only cautiously embraced the idea of rewriting the tax code in ’84 (see Alan Murray and Jeff Birnbaum’s fine retelling of the history of the 1986 Tax Reform Act—Showdown at Gucci Gulch). But he cleverly used the tantalizing prospect of reform without ever overpromising.

This is what Reagan had to say in his January, 1984 State of the Union Address:

“Let us go forward with an historic reform for fairness, simplicity, and incentives for growth. I am asking [Treasury] Secretary Don Regan for a plan for action to simplify the entire tax code, so all taxpayers, big and small, are treated more fairly. And I believe such a plan could result in that underground economy being brought into the sunlight of honest tax compliance. And it could make the tax base broader, so personal tax rates could come down, not go up. I've asked that specific recommendations, consistent with those objectives, be presented to me by December 1984.”

Note to Gov. Romney: Reagan cast reform in gauzy generalities of fairness, simplicity, and economic growth. He said he might broaden the tax base, but didn’t say how. He said he might cut tax rates, but didn’t say by how much. And he said he wanted the Treasury Secretary to get him a specific plan in December, not accidently a month after the 1984 election.

Romney, by contrast, not only promised to cut tax rates, he even said by exactly how much--20 percent across the board. Reagan’s popular goals of fairness and simplicity play distinct second fiddle to Romney’s focus on tax cuts for job creators. And instead of saying he’ll craft a plan of his own, Romney’s campaign says the details should be left to Congress. Given the level of public confidence in the Hill, he might as well have promised to turn it over to Snooki.

Romney’s biggest problem, though, is that he is so transparently trying to have it both ways. On one hand, explicit promises of tax rate cuts for all. On the other, stonewalling all questions about which popular subsidies he’d ditch.

This tactic is hardly unique in political campaigns. After all, why would any politician disclose that part of his agenda sure to make voters mad? Yet, it is fundamentally misleading. And it is causing Romney no end of grief.

Reagan, recall, was ambiguous about both sides of the bargain. This allowed him to remain purposefully vague about the gory details of tax reform throughout the ’84 campaign. And he was almost never challenged on it. Democratic presidential candidate Walter Mondale borrowed a line from a popular fast-food chain ad to ask “where’s the beef” in an effort to challenge his opponent’s fuzzy campaign promises. But Mondale was talking about primary opponent Gary Hart, not Reagan.

Romney isn’t so lucky. Sure, promising specific rate cuts was popular, especially during the GOP primaries. But Romney’s very act of explicitly laying out those rate cuts is driving deeply-skeptical general election voters to demand to know about the other half of the transaction.

The masterful Reagan gave himself both a powerful campaign issue and enough running room to propose, and eventually convince Congress to pass, the most ambitious tax reform of our time.

Now, on an issue that Republicans usually own, Romney is on the defensive. If before Nov. 6 he identifies which tax preferences he’d cut, he will unleash a firestorm of criticism from both Democrats and those special interests that benefit from these subsides. This will damage both his election chances and likelihood of reform no matter who wins in November. If Romney keeps silent, he’ll be unable to claim any kind of mandate for reform.

Somewhere, Ronald Reagan is looking on in sadness.

 

7Comments

  1. What Mitt Romney Didn't Learn from Ronald Reagan – TaxVox | News47News47  ::  4:54 pm on September 14th, 2012:

    […] What Mitt Romney Didn't Learn from Ronald Reagan – TaxVox Cancel Reply […]

  2. Michael Bindner  ::  7:10 pm on September 14th, 2012:

    Romney the wonk may have a good idea about how to do a tax reform plan that we would all think is brilliant. The problem is, he could never sell such a plan to his base, even in broad outlines. They simply don’t trust him – and while he panders to them – neither can anyone else.

  3. Tax Roundup, September 17, 2012: non-1040 extension deadline day! Also: Iowa bluffed? « Roth & Company, P.C  ::  9:32 am on September 17th, 2012:

    […] Howard Gleckman,  What Mitt Romney Didn’t Learn from Ronald Reagan (TaxVox) […]

  4. JPowers  ::  6:26 pm on September 17th, 2012:

    And Regan left a HUGE debt we are STILL paying for.

  5. peter van honk  ::  8:40 pm on September 17th, 2012:

    Funny….this site is about information on taxes….NOWHERE to find is information on the illegal Federal tax that people are asked to pay. So if Romney talks about 47% of Americans not paying these taxes he got it wrong. These people have incomes and pay taxes…just NOT the Federal tax. These people are smart.

  6. Herbert  ::  10:36 pm on August 15th, 2013:

    Piece of writing writing is also a fun, if you be familiar with after that you can write or else
    it is complicated to write.

  7. online psychic  ::  1:13 pm on October 4th, 2013:

    Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers?
    I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on.

    Any suggestions?