Tax Reform, Up Close and Personal

By :: August 10th, 2012

On Monday, I attended my first meeting of the District of Columbia Tax Reform Commission.  The independent commission was authorized by the Tax Revision Commission Reestablishment Act of 2011 and is chaired by former DC Mayor Anthony Williams.  It includes ten other members appointed by Mayor Vincent Gray and Council Chairman Kwame Brown.

I was appointed to the commission by Mayor Gray and am honored and delighted by the appointment.  As someone who has probably thought about taxes more in theory than practice, I am really looking forward to this opportunity to engage in crafting a better tax system – by which I mean one that is simpler, fairer, and more efficient as well as contributing to the district’s economic prosperity and quality of life. 

If these goals sound familiar, they should.  Presidential candidates and members of Congress tout them whenever they talk about fundamental tax reform, which is often these days as the campaign heats up and the “fiscal cliff” looms. 

But policymakers everywhere have struggled with tax reform, and with good reason.  As TPC co-director Donald Marron pointed out yesterday, tax reform is hard

Why?  Because the characteristics of a good tax system are internally inconsistent.   Think of London circa 1990, a very different place from site of today’s Olympics.  As vividly captured in Joel Slemrod and Jon Bakija’s excellent Taxing Ourselves, on March 31, 1990, rioters set fire to luxury cars and smashed windows.  Hundreds of police officers and demonstrators were injured, and hundreds of protestors were arrested. 

The reason?  A poll tax that would have fallen equally on all residents regardless of income or wealth, replacing a property tax that varied with home values.  The poll tax was reviled and eventually repealed.  But it had one advantage squarely in its column:  it was efficient.  As a per capita tax, it could not be avoided by sheltering income, working less, or buying stuff from the Internet.  The only way to avoid it was by not being alive (or, less vividly, failing to register with your local elections official).  In this case, the certainty in life was death OR taxes.

The problem was that efficiency conflicted with another goal:  fairness.  Many people think tax burdens should be progressive, or vary with ability to pay.  However, this can contradict yet another goal:  rewarding effort or economic competitiveness. 

We have all these challenges and more in DC.  There’s the District’s unique status as a state and local government, its special relationship to the federal government (which puts some revenue sources off limits), and its place in a regional economy that also includes heavy hitters like Maryland and Virginia.  DC also struggles with providing services to a diverse population with high per capita income but also a high poverty rate.

Still, the last time anyone took a good look at DC’s revenue system was 1998.  That’s the same year Google was founded.  Mark McGuire was hitting the ball out of the park instead of Bryce Harper.  The district was just emerging from insolvency and people and jobs were fleeing the city. 

A lot has changed since then.  Beyond the effects of a winning baseball team, the local economy rode out the recession better than other regions, thanks in part to a strong federal presence.  Of course, that presence also leaves the district vulnerable to federal belt tightening and limits on local fiscal autonomy.  So, it’s a good time to take a closer look at DC’s revenue system and see what we can do better.

5Comments

  1. Michael Bindner  ::  12:56 pm on August 10th, 2012:

    Please consider dropping most taxes, aside from a high income surtax, for a Value Added Tax and a VAT-like Net Business Receipts Tax (a VAT with deductions for payment of a child tax credit, health insurance or direct care and support for private charter schools and mental healthcare services as an option to a public system). This will stop most people from having to file while distributing more benefits to poorer people without making them file taxes. It will also necessitate a realistic system to share some revenue with neighboring jurisdictions – including federal entities who would be taxed based on their personnel costs rather than their entire budgets through some kind of PILT – essentially solving the whole issue of non-resident income taxes that is holding up statehood.

  2. beowulf  ::  9:30 pm on August 10th, 2012:

    Ask yourself, what would Bill Vickrey do?

    That is not a mystery, site value taxation and congestion (“efficient marginal cost”) pricing for traffic, parking spots and utilities.
    http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/vickrey-william_on-site-value-taxation.html

  3. Ralph H  ::  8:48 pm on August 12th, 2012:

    Good Luck. I’m sure you will gain valuable insight into how hard it is to do the right thing, (or possibly anything). One piece of advice – stay away from a soda tax — mayor Nutter lost all credibility on that one!

  4. Personal taxes  ::  1:16 am on November 21st, 2012:

    We can gain knowledge about tax from this post.

  5. LiHouLinHengXinimperia  ::  11:43 pm on March 21st, 2013:

    I reckon something truly interesting about your web blog so I saved to favorites . LiHouLin HengXin imperial with the jewellery industry meet sprint IPO listed tid http://dede.chinapetclub.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=138360