New Plan Expands EITC Benefits for Families with Young Children

By :: August 6th, 2012

The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) provides a significant income boost to low-income single-parent families, but can severely penalize those families if the parent marries. A new plan from Brooklyn College economist Robert Cherry could sharply reduce that problem while sharply increasing benefits for families with young children – particularly those with married parents.

Analysts consistently find that the EITC encourages work and reduces poverty. Recent evidence shows that EITC receipt is correlated with improved health outcomes for infants. But the credit is not all roses. A major problem is the marriage penalty embedded within the structure of the EITC. Taken to the extreme, if a single mom of three children earns $17,090, her EITC totals almost $6,000. If she marries a partner who earns more than $5,210, her EITC falls by just over 21 cents for every dollar his earnings exceed that threshold. If he earns $32,970 or more, she loses her EITC entirely.

Many analysts, including myself, have offered ideas for reducing or eliminating marriage penalties in the EITC, essentially by developing an individual worker credit and a child credit, rather than combining the two.

Cherry’s New Mothers Tax Relief (NMTR) proposal is more modest and would focus on marriage penalties that the EITC imposes on single parents. The proposal would be limited to parents with at least one pre-school aged child. While the NMTR does not increase the maximum EITC benefit, it does increase the income range over which the maximum benefit applies. For single-parent families, the NMTR (solid gray line in graphic) would start to phase out at a slightly higher income level than the current EITC ($18,000 rather than $16,690) and the phaseout rate would decline from the current 15.98 percent to 12 percent. Ultimately, this means that single-parent families would continue to receive a credit until earnings reached almost $44,000, rather than just over $36,000.


Benefits would rise much more for married couples. The proposal would increase the phaseout threshold for couples from not quite $22,000 to $40,000 and would reduce the phaseout rate from 15.98 percent to 6 percent to mitigate any remaining marriage penalties. Cherry contends that this would allow low-income parents to decide about marriage based on factors other than economic incentives in the tax code. At the extreme, the plan would allow a married couple to keep their entire EITC. For parents with 1 child, this is almost $3,100 – when under current law they would lose their EITC entirely.

Besides mitigating marriage penalties, the NMTR would also substantially increase the EITC for many parents with a young child – getting needed funds to lower middle class married families. If the proposal were limited to families with a child under age 3, Cherry estimates an annual cost of $8.5 billion. If the proposal were limited to families with a child under age 6, the annual cost of the proposal would be $15 billion. For reference, TPC estimates the total cost of the EITC in 2011 to be $57.5 billion.

This plan doesn’t go as far as others in separating out work and child incentives – and focuses on a very narrow population (families with a pre-school aged child), but it certainly provides for another way to improve the EITC for vulnerable low-income families by increasing benefits and reducing marriage penalties. The plan serves as a reminder that while the EITC continues to provide essential support to low-income families, there’s still room for improvement.


  1. Michael Bindner  ::  8:11 am on August 7th, 2012:

    The Center for Fiscal Equity ends the EITC and ramps up the Child Tax Credit, which will be both refundable and uncapped and taken against a VAT-like Net Business Receipts Tax rather than personal income taxes (so individuals no longer have to file to get it). It should be increased to at least $500 per child per month, if not more, and replace the mortgage interest deduction, child tax exemption, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance and the property tax deduction. It should also be paid to the unemployed and to people in an adult education program replacing TANF. Its time to stop using welfare reform to force people into low wage, dead-end jobs. That borders on slavery. If wages themselves are too low, raise the minimum wage and make it easier to get into paid, subsidized training.

  2. engagement rings emerald cut  ::  1:18 pm on June 28th, 2013:

    Howdy! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

    my web-site … engagement rings emerald cut

  3. echar un vistazo a estos chicos  ::  7:55 am on June 22nd, 2014:

    Yes! Finally someone writes about ways to help children.

  4. lib-315-week-3-discussion-question-dq-2-deep-ecology  ::  3:16 pm on August 28th, 2014:

    This is my first time go to see at here and i am truly
    happy to read all at alone place.

    Here is my weblog lib-315-week-3-discussion-question-dq-2-deep-ecology

  5.  ::  8:06 am on September 11th, 2014:

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you
    relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what
    youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  6. Trey  ::  1:08 pm on October 6th, 2014:

    Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation;
    many of us have developed some nice practices and we are looking to swap techniques with other folks, why not shoot me an email if

  7.  ::  7:06 pm on November 13th, 2014:

    I just couldn’t leave your web site before suggesting that
    I extremely enjoyed the usual info a person supply to your guests?
    Is going to be back regularly in order to check up on new posts