How Blurry is the Line between Monetary and Fiscal Policy?

By :: June 2nd, 2010

Economists have traditionally drawn a sharp distinction between monetary and fiscal policy. Monetary policy should try to promote growth and limit inflation by setting short-term interest rates, managing the money supply, and providing liquidity during times of financial stress. Fiscal policy should also encourage growth and, more broadly, promote the general welfare through careful choices about spending, taxes, and borrowing. The Federal Reserve has responsibility for monetary policy, while Congress and the President handle fiscal policy.

 

That clean distinction was one of many casualties of the financial crisis. As credit markets froze, the Fed pursued unconventional policies that blurred the line between fiscal and monetary policy. For example, it purchased more than $1 trillion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, created new lending facilities for commercial paper and asset-backed securities, and provided special support for such key financial institutions as AIG, Bank of America, and Citigroup.

 

Those actions differed from conventional monetary policy in two ways. First, they exposed the Fed to more financial risk. Short-term Treasury securities, the Fed’s usual fare, carry no credit risk and almost no interest rate risk. In contrast, the Fed’s new portfolio has healthy doses of both. Second, in several cases the Fed offered to purchase financial assets at above-market prices or, equivalently, to make loans at below-market interest rates. In effect, the Fed chose to subsidize some specific financial activities.

 

Both changes increased the Fed’s fiscal importance.

 

Most visibly, Fed profits have jumped as its portfolio expanded and it acquired higher-yielding assets. Indeed, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that Fed profits will hit $77 billion in 2010, up from $32 billion in 2008. That makes them the fourth largest source of federal revenues, after personal income, social insurance, and corporate income taxes, but ahead of estate and excise taxes. Actual returns could be higher or lower, however, depending on how well its investments perform.

 

Also important, though less visible, are subsidies implicit in some of the Fed’s financing programs. The Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), for example, offered favorable long-term funding to investors who wanted to finance investments in securities backed by auto loans, student loans, and certain other types of debt. Similar programs provided favorable funding to support commercial paper markets and to assist AIG, Bank of America, and Citigroup. CBO recently pegged the initial cost of the resulting subsidies at $21 billion.

 

Not all programs created subsidies, however. CBO concluded, for example, that the MBS purchase program did not involve subsidies because the Fed made its purchases at market prices.

 

To be sure, the Fed’s fiscal initiatives were dwarfed by the explicitly fiscal actions taken by Congress and Presidents Bush and Obama. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), for example, was originally estimated to involve subsidies of $189 billion (a figure that has fallen as financial markets have healed), and support to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has added tens of billions more. Still, CBO’s estimates do highlight the Fed’s move into fiscal territory as it battled the financial crisis.

 

Those steps were appropriate given the severity and suddenness of the crisis, but have fueled concerns about the Fed’s scope of authority. Some members of Congress, for example, have questioned whether the Fed should be able to engage in even moderate amounts of fiscal policy without congressional oversight. Their increased interest in Fed oversight, in turn, has raised concerns about defending the Fed’s traditional independence in making monetary policy.

 

As Chairman Ben Bernanke argued in a speech last week, maintaining the Fed’s independence in monetary policy would be easier if policymakers would “further clarify the dividing line between monetary and fiscal responsibilities.” Let’s hope such guidance comes along before the next financial crisis strikes.

9Comments

  1. Anonymous  ::  2:23 am on June 3rd, 2010:

    Assume for the sake of argument that paper money is valued like any equity claim. This means that the value of the dollar is determined by the assets (and liabilities) of the entity that issued it. But of course the Fed can be thought of as a branch of the government, so the value of the dollar is determined by the assets and liabilities of the government. In other words, monetary and fiscal policy both matter. Sargent's “Four Big Inflations” (among many others) gave pretty strong support to this idea.

  2. Anonymous  ::  8:40 pm on June 3rd, 2010:

    I fear there is a certain amount of whistling past the graveyard in this sector. Some of these assets could still prove to be worthless if the housing market never goes up to its previous heights – of it it goes up only after a period of prolonged inflation in wages (which is preferable to mass devaluation and bankruptcy).
    Incentives could conflict for the Fed – to use a gross understatement.

  3. Anonymous  ::  6:29 am on June 6th, 2010:

    Is it can assume for equity of money and asset? From the story it seem to be a huge number of money

  4. Anonymous  ::  3:29 am on June 10th, 2010:

    Monetary economist Scott Sumner has been writing a lot on the monetary policy/fiscal policy relationship, and just did an interesting summary post on the subject:
    http://www.themoneyillusion.com/?p=5544

  5. Fake College Degree  ::  6:51 pm on July 3rd, 2013:

    Spot on with this write-up, I actually believe that
    this website needs a lot more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the info!

  6. how to reduce snoring during sleep Naturally  ::  6:01 pm on June 21st, 2014:

    how to reduce snoring during sleep Naturally

    TaxVox » Blog Archive How Blurry is the Line between Monetary and Fiscal Policy? » TaxVox

  7. TUMI 26108  ::  9:34 pm on August 26th, 2014:

    I like the valuable information you provide in your articles.
    I’ll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly.

    I’m quite sure I will learn a lot of new stuff right here!
    Good luck for the next!

  8. ニューバランスNew Balance  ::  1:08 pm on August 30th, 2014:

    This website was… how do I say it? Relevant!!
    Finally I’ve found something that helped me. Many thanks!

  9. Minibus Hire Sawbridgeworth  ::  2:14 pm on October 7th, 2014:

    Unquestionably believe that which you stated.
    Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly don’t know
    about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing
    without having side-effects , people can take a signal.

    Will probably be back to get more. Thanks