The Audacity of Campaign Promises
Barack Obama gave four speeches last night. The first was the same optimistic cry for change that has carried him so far in this Presidential season. The second was a tough, frontal attack on the economic and foreign policies of both George Bush and John McCain. The third was a (Bill) Clintonesque bit of social policy triangulation—we can all work together to find solutions to such hot button issues as abortion, guns, gay marriage, and immigration. The fourth was a recitation of his economic agenda—a long list of promises that is familiar to readers of TaxVox by now.
Still, heard all at once, this catalogue is breathtaking:, universal health care, higher education for every child, more money for early
childhood education, rebuilding the military, $150 billion for alternative energy research, and tax cuts for small business and for “95 percent of all working families.”
Last night, he insisted he would pay for it all. But how? All he told us was that he'd end the war in Iraq, close corporate tax loopholes, and eliminate wasteful and obsolete government programs.
This is, of course, impossible.
It being the most political of speeches, Obama left out a few things. He never said, for example, how much he'd tax the unlucky (or lucky, depending on your point of view) 5 percent. He never mentioned that his key tool for achieving energy independence in 10 years is an auction of carbon permits that is equivalent to a massive tax on fossil fuels.
It all sounded so hopeful. So painless. So, may I say, audacious.
I get that politics is a short-term business and that fiscal responsibility is a stone cold electoral loser. However….
Obama spoke eloquently last night about our moral obligation to future generations. And he may mean it. But there is a stunning irony in all this. These trillions of dollars of unfunded promises will have to be paid for eventually. As it happens, much of the tab will end up in the laps of the very 20-somethings who are so enamored of Obama's vision for the future.
As a hopeful 30 year-old, I do question where the money will come from and feel for the top 5%. But I also question the notion that by staying on our current path we shall find a new destination. Maybe a heavily scrutinized new path is the proper middle ground.
I agree, at least we will have something to show for it.
Unfortunately, one of the sources cited in the explanation of Obama's plan on factcheck.org is the “Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans” report. Which was researched and authored by….
the very same Tax Policy Center that employs the author of this blog. The report is also linked within the blog entry.
Give it a read.
Oh well, we're in our 20's it would be really sad if we weren't hopeful and willing to take some financial risks to make a better world.
Your 20-Something Comrad in Hope
“These trillions of dollars of unfunded promises will have to be paid for eventually. As it happens, much of the tab will end up in the laps of the very 20-somethings who are so enamored of Obama's vision for the future.”
Even if this is true, at least this time we'll have something to show for it beside a few already wealthy businessman getting wealthier, and a long-fought war on humanity (Iraq), for profit. You write very well, it's too bad you sold you soul. for those interested, Obama's plan does balance spending with new revenue, check out factcheck.org for a complete review.
Hopeful 20-Something