The Senate Defaults on a Foreclosure Bill
Why is it that the biggest problems always seem to encourage the worst possible solutions? The latest case in point: The Senate's housing bill, grandly titled “The Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008.”
If only it were so. Instead, this bill, which will almost surely get worse as it grinds through the legislative process, combines a few modestly good ideas with some that are merely bad and a few that are truly dreadful. As tax policy, it is execrable. One provision may even encourage more foreclosures.
The worst idea may be a $7000 tax credit for buyers of homes in foreclosure. Under this bill, a bank that owns a foreclosed house will get a big selling price advantage over the single mom who
lives next door and has been faithfully paying off her loan. Indeed, because lenders would expect a higher price when they put a foreclosed house on the market, such a law might even encourage banks to repossess properties more quickly.
Now, it might not be a bad idea to replace all mortgage interest deductions with credits, since they would increase benefits to moderate-income homeowners, who presumably need them more than wealthy buyers of mini-mansions. But if Congress does this only for foreclosed property, it is asking for big trouble.
Another proposal would give homeowners who do not itemize a new above-the-line deduction of up to $1000 to offset their property taxes. This would mostly benefit seniors and others who have paid off their mortgages and who, despite the recent slump in prices, often have huge equity built up in their homes. They seem to be the last people who need help. Besides, home ownership is already among the most highly tax-subsidized things we do.
The bill would also allow companies to use this year’s losses to reduce their tax bills from the boom times of 2004 and 2005. The big winners: financial institutions and homebuilders, the very firms that helped generate the real estate bubble in the first place. Perhaps, without the extra tax breaks, some will fail in the wake of their speculative madness. What's so bad about that?
The bill would also allow state and local governments to sell an additional $10 billion in tax-exempt mortgage bonds to refinance subprime loans. As I have written in the past, these bonds were supposed to make homes more affordable for first-time homebuyers. But by bailing out underwater borrowers, they will artificially prop up prices and only make homes more costly for new buyers.
To be fair, there are some useful nuggets in the bill. More honest closing documents for buyers may help, so would modernizing the antiquated and horribly inefficient FHA program. But these proposals are vastly outweighed by the truly awful tax provisions. This is being touted as a rare instance where Senate Democrats and Republicans are working together on a bill. Maybe partisanship isn't so bad after all.
Links……
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]…
[...] robot builder | forextrading | forex managed accounts | forex trading | forex trading strategy | forex markets | free forex trading | forex trading education | wall street forex robot | forex analysis | best [...]
Got bored and nothing else to do at my room, and began searching for blogs and I found your web site! However, I am curious on whether or not you’d be keen to trade hyperlinks with me – just approve this comment, and I will add your link to my website that has PR3. Hopefully you will agree! Cheers! ps – sorry i’m pretty bad with my english although, hope you do not mind.
I liked as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your published material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following. Not well unquestionably come more formerly again since the exact same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.
The whole business is nasty on both sides, particularly the amount owed.the penalty and tax payment should never exceed the value of the income gained and certainly never be more than the value of the assets hidden. There should be a cap – which should be the value of the base asset on which the interest was earned
The Senate provision would deny the newly created property tax deduction to individuals living in jurisdictions that raise property tax rates, unless the rate is increased “pursuant to an equalization policy” already in effect or “as a result of any votes of the residents of such jurisdiction to increase funding for pre-school, primary, secondary, or higher education.” It is unclear what is meant by “equalization policy” in this context; the term is not being used as it usually understood in state and local finance.
Perhaps the most incredible and telling provision in the Senate bill relates to local property taxes and demonstrates the unworldliness of Senate unthinking and irresponsibility. That provision would give homeowners who do not itemize a new above-the-line deduction of up to $1000 to offset their property taxes, but would deny the new deduction to any resident of a locality that raises its property tax rate between April 2 and next January 1, broadly preempting local taxing authority in a way most harmful to localities the hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis–the ones most forced to raise property taxes in order to balance their budgets. Because most local governments are on a June or July 1 fiscal year, the Senate provision is like a dagger–for not only would it further imbalance the federal deficit and debt, but also increase inflationary pressures by more weakening of the dollar–just what local governments, which MUST balance their budgets annually, least need.
So, apparently, the idea is to try and do greater harm to the communities in the U.S. most adversely impacted by the foreclosure crisis–in addition, of course, to the next generation of all Americans.